印为红字的
业务流程重组
健康促进
晋升(国际象棋)
平面图(考古学)
过程(计算)
过程管理
医学
业务
风险分析(工程)
计算机科学
心理学
护理部
营销
公共卫生
政治学
操作系统
精益制造
历史
数学教育
考古
政治
法学
作者
Brad L. Neiger,Rosemary Thackeray,Michael C. Fagen
标识
DOI:10.1177/1524839910393281
摘要
Priority setting is an important component of systematic planning in health promotion and also factors into the development of a comprehensive evaluation plan. The basic priority rating (BPR) model was introduced more than 50 years ago and includes criteria that should be considered in any priority setting approach (i.e., use of predetermined criteria, standardized comparisons, and a rubric that controls bias). Although the BPR model has provided basic direction in priority setting, it does not represent the broad array of data currently available to decision makers. Elements in the model also give more weight to the impact of communicable diseases compared with chronic diseases. For these reasons, several modifications are recommended to improve the BPR model and to better assist health promotion practitioners in the priority setting process. The authors also suggest a new name, BPR 2.0, to represent this revised model.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI