Blood pressure and glycaemic effects of dapagliflozin versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes on combination antihypertensive therapy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study

医学 达帕格列嗪 安慰剂 2型糖尿病 内科学 血压 糖尿病 动态血压 内分泌学 替代医学 病理
作者
Michael A. Weber,Traci A. Mansfield,Valerie A. Cain,Nayyar Iqbal,Shamik Parikh,Agata Ptaszynska
出处
期刊:The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:4 (3): 211-220 被引量:223
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2213-8587(15)00417-9
摘要

Summary

Background

Hypertension is a common comorbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a major risk factor for microvascular and macrovascular disease. Although the blood pressure-lowering effects of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are already established, guidance is needed on how to use these drugs in patients already receiving antihypertensive therapy. We aimed to compare blood pressure and glycaemic effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin with placebo in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension.

Methods

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study we enrolled patients from 311 centres in 16 countries across five continents. Patients had uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 7·0%–10·5%; 53–91 mmol/mol) and hypertension (systolic 140–165 mm Hg and diastolic 85–105 mm Hg at both enrolment and randomisation, and a mean 24 h blood pressure of ≥130/80 mm Hg by ambulatory monitoring within 1 week of randomisation) and were receiving oral antihyperglycaemic drugs, insulin, or both, plus a renin–angiotensin system blocker and an additional antihypertensive drug. Using an interactive voice-response system, we randomly assigned (1:1) patients to dapagliflozin 10 mg once a day or to placebo, with randomisation stratified by additional antihypertensive drug use and insulin use at baseline, in a block size of two. The co-primary endpoints were changes in seated systolic blood pressure and HbA1c measured in the full analysis set, which included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had both a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement of efficacy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01195662.

Findings

Between Oct 29, 2010, and Oct 4, 2012, we randomly assigned 225 patients to dapagliflozin and 224 to placebo. Seated systolic blood pressure was significantly reduced in the group assigned to dapagliflozin (adjusted mean change from baseline −11·90 mm Hg [95% CI −13·97 to −9·82]) compared with those assigned to placebo (−7·62 mm Hg [–9·72 to −5·51]; placebo-adjusted difference for dapagliflozin −4·28 mm Hg [–6·54 to −2·02]; p=0·0002). Reductions in HbA1c concentrations were also significantly greater in patients assigned to dapagliflozin (adjusted mean change from baseline −0·63% [95% CI −0·76 to −0·50]) than in those assigned to placebo (−0·02% [–0·15 to 0·12]; placebo-adjusted difference −0·61% [–0·76 to −0·46,]; p<0·0001). In a post-hoc analysis, we found difference in blood pressure versus placebo was greater in patients receiving a β blocker (−5·76 mm Hg [95% CI −10·28 to −1·23]) or a calcium-channel blocker (−5·13 mm Hg, [−9·47 to −0·79]) as their additional antihypertensive drug than in those receiving a thiazide diuretic (−2·38 mm Hg [–6·16 to 1·40]). Adverse events were similar in the dapagliflozin and placebo groups (98 [44%] patients vs 93 [42%], respectively, had at least one adverse event), with few adverse events related to renal function (1% vs <1%) or volume depletion (<1% vs 0%).

Interpretation

Dapagliflozin 10 mg significantly improved blood pressure and HbA1c and was tolerated similarly to placebo. Its blood pressure-lowering properties were particularly favourable in patients already receiving a β blocker or calcium-channel blocker. Dapagliflozin could benefit patients with type 2 diabetes who need a diuretic-like effect to optimise control of blood pressure, adding meaningful efficacy to antihypertensive drug regimens.

Funding

Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
wzy完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
LFC发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
rrm完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
5秒前
YYYYY完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
星辰大海应助浅辰采纳,获得10
10秒前
Sususoule发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
xh发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
科研牛马完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
脑洞疼应助LFC采纳,获得10
11秒前
林也完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
可爱多885发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
巴旦木发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
小斌应助xh采纳,获得10
16秒前
搜集达人应助ZZQ采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
bkagyin应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
小马甲应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
riverflowing应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
18秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
所所应助123采纳,获得10
21秒前
桐桐应助菰蒲采纳,获得10
23秒前
rrm发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
亚尔发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
完美世界应助Enoch采纳,获得10
25秒前
田様应助ccc采纳,获得10
26秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
An experimental and analytical investigation on the fatigue behaviour of fuselage riveted lap joints: The significance of the rivet squeeze force, and a comparison of 2024-T3 and Glare 3 1000
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, Global Edition, 6th edition 600
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
ALUMINUM STANDARDS AND DATA 500
Walter Gilbert: Selected Works 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3664444
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3224488
关于积分的说明 9757694
捐赠科研通 2934379
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1606832
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 758873
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 735012