C-reactive protein and cholesterol are equally strong predictors of cardiovascular risk and both are important for quality clinical care

医学 C反应蛋白 胆固醇 重症监护医学 内科学 炎症
作者
Paul M. Ridker,John J.P. Kastelein,Jacques Genest,Wolfgang Köenig
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:34 (17): 1258-1261 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/eht022
摘要

Physicians do not measure biomarkers simply to predict risk. Rather, they do so to better target therapy and improve the lives of their patients. Thus, when considering the use of any biomarker for cardiovascular risk prediction in primary prevention, thoughtful clinicians, and those writing guidelines should insist that two fundamental questions be answered affirmatively. First, is there clear evidence that the biomarker of interest predicts future cardiovascular events independent of other risk markers? And secondly, is there clear evidence that those identified by the biomarker of interest benefit from a therapy they otherwise would not have received? No imaging biomarker can answer these questions affirmatively, nor can a variety of plasma biomarkers such as lipoprotein(a) or triglycerides. As we will discuss below, the answer to both of these questions is clearly ‘yes’ for C-reactive protein as well as for cholesterol. Yet, while recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the prevention of heart disease strongly endorse cholesterol screening, those same guidelines are silent on C-reactive protein.1 Inflammation is a fundamental component of atherosclerosis.2 For more than a decade, data from large-scale prospective cohorts in the USA and Europe have consistently indicated that the predictive value of the inflammatory biomarker C-reactive protein is at least as large as that of cholesterol.3,4 This observation is important since half of all heart attacks and strokes occur among those with average if not low cholesterol levels. That C-reactive protein and lipids are equal contributors to vascular risk has recently been confirmed in an elegant 2012 meta-analysis published in the New England Journal of Medicine by the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration that analysed data from 38 prospective studies and included 166 596 men and women without prior disease.5 Specifically, for a prediction model that included age, smoking, systolic blood …

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
英俊的铭应助Alison采纳,获得10
1秒前
xyy完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
FashionBoy应助幺幺采纳,获得10
2秒前
anchor发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
科研通AI6.2应助Fly采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
ZYC007完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
LEEPLUM完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Lucas应助lyyy采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
aajhajkahna应助坚定的黑猫采纳,获得20
9秒前
Akim应助张张采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助LZY采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
怕孤独的问芙完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
传奇3应助anchor采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
ocean发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
空白发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Zhang_Jt107发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
康少发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
周周完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
Mr曹完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
忧郁丹翠完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
一二发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
roselau发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
传奇3应助张一迪采纳,获得10
22秒前
hinsir发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behavior 1000
Health Psychology 1000
全员动态考核,锚定高质量发展:读懂同济大学教师人事改革新政的深层价值 900
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7596613
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9173005
关于积分的说明 19637727
捐赠科研通 7173800
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3268045
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2432760
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2261245