Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants

医学 相对风险 瑞舒伐他汀 荟萃分析 阿托伐他汀 内科学 随机对照试验 需要伤害的数量 安慰剂 他汀类 冲程(发动机) 置信区间 需要治疗的数量 病理 替代医学 工程类 机械工程
作者
Henock G. Yebyo,Hélène E. Aschmann,Marco Kaufmann,Milo A. Puhan
出处
期刊:American Heart Journal [Elsevier]
卷期号:210: 18-28 被引量:112
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.007
摘要

The current guidelines of statins for primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention were based on results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses that suffer from limitations.We searched in PubMed for existing systematic reviews and individual open-label or double-blinded randomized controlled trials that compared a statin with a placebo or another, which were published in English until January 01, 2018. We performed a random-effect pairwise meta-analysis of all statins as a class and network meta-analysis for the specific statins on different benefit and harm outcomes.In the pairwise meta-analyses, statins as a class showed statistically significant risk reductions on non-fatal MI (risk ratio [RR] 0.62, 95% CI 0.53-0.72), CVD mortality (RR 0.80, 0.71-0.91), all-cause mortality (RR 0.89, 0.85-0.93), non-fatal stroke (RR 0.83, 0.75-0.92), unstable angina (RR 0.75, 0.63-0.91), and composite major cardiovascular events (RR 0.74, 0.67-0.81). Statins increased statistically significantly relative and absolute risks of myopathy (RR 1.08, 1.01-1.15; Risk difference [RD] 13, 2-24 per 10,000 person-years); renal dysfunction (RR 1.12, 1.00-1.26; RD 16, 0-36 per 10,000 person-years); and hepatic dysfunction (RR 1.16, 1.02-1.31; RD 8, 1-16 per 10,000 person-years). The drug-level network meta-analyses showed that atorvastatin and rosuvastatin were most effective in reducing CVD events while atorvastatin appeared to have the best safety profile.All statins showed statistically significant risk reduction of CVD and all-cause mortality in primary prevention populations while increasing the risk for some harm risks. However, the benefit-harm profile differed by statin type. A quantitative assessment of the benefit-harm balance is thus needed since meta-analyses alone are insufficient to inform whether statins provide net benefit.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
可爱的函函应助tiezhu采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
一一完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
元宝团子完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
hahage完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Lengbo完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
li发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
板蓝根@发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
cy123完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
1秒前
奋斗静蕾完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
ZCM发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Akim应助柏莉采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
所所应助Lmj采纳,获得10
2秒前
布布完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
领导范儿应助名副棋实采纳,获得10
3秒前
Wlin完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
kmkz发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
lidada发布了新的文献求助100
4秒前
莫谷蓝完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
泡泡发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
大力的宝川完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
嫤姝完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
9700发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
zywzyw发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
沈华炜完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
孙pc发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
6秒前
善学以致用应助Wlin采纳,获得10
6秒前
琳琳完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Ava应助奋斗静蕾采纳,获得10
7秒前
Trost发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
李健应助无辜的薯片采纳,获得10
8秒前
某亮发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1621
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] | NHBS Field Guides & Natural History 1500
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 1000
Brittle fracture in welded ships 1000
Metagames: Games about Games 700
King Tyrant 680
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5573825
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4660098
关于积分的说明 14727788
捐赠科研通 4599933
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2524546
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1494900
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1464997