Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants

医学 相对风险 瑞舒伐他汀 荟萃分析 阿托伐他汀 内科学 随机对照试验 需要伤害的数量 安慰剂 他汀类 冲程(发动机) 置信区间 需要治疗的数量 病理 替代医学 工程类 机械工程
作者
Henock G. Yebyo,Hélène E. Aschmann,Marco Kaufmann,Milo A. Puhan
出处
期刊:American Heart Journal [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:210: 18-28 被引量:112
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.007
摘要

The current guidelines of statins for primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention were based on results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses that suffer from limitations.We searched in PubMed for existing systematic reviews and individual open-label or double-blinded randomized controlled trials that compared a statin with a placebo or another, which were published in English until January 01, 2018. We performed a random-effect pairwise meta-analysis of all statins as a class and network meta-analysis for the specific statins on different benefit and harm outcomes.In the pairwise meta-analyses, statins as a class showed statistically significant risk reductions on non-fatal MI (risk ratio [RR] 0.62, 95% CI 0.53-0.72), CVD mortality (RR 0.80, 0.71-0.91), all-cause mortality (RR 0.89, 0.85-0.93), non-fatal stroke (RR 0.83, 0.75-0.92), unstable angina (RR 0.75, 0.63-0.91), and composite major cardiovascular events (RR 0.74, 0.67-0.81). Statins increased statistically significantly relative and absolute risks of myopathy (RR 1.08, 1.01-1.15; Risk difference [RD] 13, 2-24 per 10,000 person-years); renal dysfunction (RR 1.12, 1.00-1.26; RD 16, 0-36 per 10,000 person-years); and hepatic dysfunction (RR 1.16, 1.02-1.31; RD 8, 1-16 per 10,000 person-years). The drug-level network meta-analyses showed that atorvastatin and rosuvastatin were most effective in reducing CVD events while atorvastatin appeared to have the best safety profile.All statins showed statistically significant risk reduction of CVD and all-cause mortality in primary prevention populations while increasing the risk for some harm risks. However, the benefit-harm profile differed by statin type. A quantitative assessment of the benefit-harm balance is thus needed since meta-analyses alone are insufficient to inform whether statins provide net benefit.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
情怀应助着急的清采纳,获得10
2秒前
韩威发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
星辰大海应助舒适的若云采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
666发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
桐桐应助Murmansk采纳,获得10
6秒前
8秒前
husiqi_547完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
dara997发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
我是张铁柱·完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
andre20完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
SH完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
轻狂书生发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
吐尔洪完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
13秒前
韩威完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
鹭怡完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
兮豫完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
没有稗子完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
英俊的铭应助666采纳,获得10
16秒前
科研通AI6应助dara997采纳,获得10
17秒前
共享精神应助ddd采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
领导范儿应助Taylor采纳,获得10
18秒前
Poker完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
完美世界应助李翔采纳,获得10
21秒前
吐尔洪发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
kkk发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
Voskov完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
浮游应助llllliu采纳,获得10
24秒前
26秒前
党弛完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
26秒前
重要安完成签到,获得积分20
29秒前
款冬发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
dreamlightzy应助自由的雅旋采纳,获得10
32秒前
33秒前
高分求助中
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
Comparing natural with chemical additive production 500
Machine Learning in Chemistry 500
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 500
A Manual for the Identification of Plant Seeds and Fruits : Second revised edition 500
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.) 400
Refractory Castable Engineering 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5203698
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4383107
关于积分的说明 13648087
捐赠科研通 4240691
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2326584
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1324220
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1276296