Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants

医学 相对风险 瑞舒伐他汀 荟萃分析 阿托伐他汀 内科学 随机对照试验 需要伤害的数量 安慰剂 他汀类 冲程(发动机) 置信区间 需要治疗的数量 病理 替代医学 工程类 机械工程
作者
Henock G. Yebyo,Hélène E. Aschmann,Marco Kaufmann,Milo A. Puhan
出处
期刊:American Heart Journal [Elsevier]
卷期号:210: 18-28 被引量:112
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.007
摘要

The current guidelines of statins for primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention were based on results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses that suffer from limitations.We searched in PubMed for existing systematic reviews and individual open-label or double-blinded randomized controlled trials that compared a statin with a placebo or another, which were published in English until January 01, 2018. We performed a random-effect pairwise meta-analysis of all statins as a class and network meta-analysis for the specific statins on different benefit and harm outcomes.In the pairwise meta-analyses, statins as a class showed statistically significant risk reductions on non-fatal MI (risk ratio [RR] 0.62, 95% CI 0.53-0.72), CVD mortality (RR 0.80, 0.71-0.91), all-cause mortality (RR 0.89, 0.85-0.93), non-fatal stroke (RR 0.83, 0.75-0.92), unstable angina (RR 0.75, 0.63-0.91), and composite major cardiovascular events (RR 0.74, 0.67-0.81). Statins increased statistically significantly relative and absolute risks of myopathy (RR 1.08, 1.01-1.15; Risk difference [RD] 13, 2-24 per 10,000 person-years); renal dysfunction (RR 1.12, 1.00-1.26; RD 16, 0-36 per 10,000 person-years); and hepatic dysfunction (RR 1.16, 1.02-1.31; RD 8, 1-16 per 10,000 person-years). The drug-level network meta-analyses showed that atorvastatin and rosuvastatin were most effective in reducing CVD events while atorvastatin appeared to have the best safety profile.All statins showed statistically significant risk reduction of CVD and all-cause mortality in primary prevention populations while increasing the risk for some harm risks. However, the benefit-harm profile differed by statin type. A quantitative assessment of the benefit-harm balance is thus needed since meta-analyses alone are insufficient to inform whether statins provide net benefit.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
kk完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
王999999发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
lyn发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
大个应助hh采纳,获得10
2秒前
小二郎应助222666采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
114514发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
zmy完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
如云轻如水澈完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
yyy完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
iex777完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
睡觉大王完成签到 ,获得积分20
8秒前
8秒前
无极微光应助hust610wh采纳,获得20
9秒前
10秒前
11秒前
脑洞疼应助SHC采纳,获得10
11秒前
中意发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
wyyp发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
斯文败类应助pumpkin采纳,获得10
13秒前
冬日完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
英姑应助79999采纳,获得10
14秒前
很大一个渊完成签到 ,获得积分20
14秒前
14秒前
CipherSage应助张瑞雪采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
whf发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
hh发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
wys发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
18秒前
蒋美桥发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
Feldspar inclusion dating of ceramics and burnt stones 1000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 801
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5963394
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7223820
关于积分的说明 15966481
捐赠科研通 5099758
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2739874
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1702646
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1619384