Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants

医学 相对风险 瑞舒伐他汀 荟萃分析 阿托伐他汀 内科学 随机对照试验 需要伤害的数量 安慰剂 他汀类 冲程(发动机) 置信区间 需要治疗的数量 病理 替代医学 工程类 机械工程
作者
Henock G. Yebyo,Hélène E. Aschmann,Marco Kaufmann,Milo A. Puhan
出处
期刊:American Heart Journal [Elsevier]
卷期号:210: 18-28 被引量:112
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.007
摘要

The current guidelines of statins for primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention were based on results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses that suffer from limitations.We searched in PubMed for existing systematic reviews and individual open-label or double-blinded randomized controlled trials that compared a statin with a placebo or another, which were published in English until January 01, 2018. We performed a random-effect pairwise meta-analysis of all statins as a class and network meta-analysis for the specific statins on different benefit and harm outcomes.In the pairwise meta-analyses, statins as a class showed statistically significant risk reductions on non-fatal MI (risk ratio [RR] 0.62, 95% CI 0.53-0.72), CVD mortality (RR 0.80, 0.71-0.91), all-cause mortality (RR 0.89, 0.85-0.93), non-fatal stroke (RR 0.83, 0.75-0.92), unstable angina (RR 0.75, 0.63-0.91), and composite major cardiovascular events (RR 0.74, 0.67-0.81). Statins increased statistically significantly relative and absolute risks of myopathy (RR 1.08, 1.01-1.15; Risk difference [RD] 13, 2-24 per 10,000 person-years); renal dysfunction (RR 1.12, 1.00-1.26; RD 16, 0-36 per 10,000 person-years); and hepatic dysfunction (RR 1.16, 1.02-1.31; RD 8, 1-16 per 10,000 person-years). The drug-level network meta-analyses showed that atorvastatin and rosuvastatin were most effective in reducing CVD events while atorvastatin appeared to have the best safety profile.All statins showed statistically significant risk reduction of CVD and all-cause mortality in primary prevention populations while increasing the risk for some harm risks. However, the benefit-harm profile differed by statin type. A quantitative assessment of the benefit-harm balance is thus needed since meta-analyses alone are insufficient to inform whether statins provide net benefit.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
每㐬山风发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
qaq完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
猪猪侠完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
假寐发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
科目三应助KH采纳,获得10
4秒前
麦克发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
yxyer发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
yeyexueqiu发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
dududuudu完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
ZZZaa发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
wanci应助完美花生采纳,获得10
13秒前
30发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
浮游应助Ellis采纳,获得20
15秒前
Jing发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
19秒前
11111发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
Hello应助小鱼干采纳,获得10
19秒前
LONG完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
fudanlihan发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
luzi完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
宝铭YUAN完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
香蕉觅云应助真实的小伙采纳,获得10
27秒前
西园寺鹿旎完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
fudanlihan完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
852应助yeyexueqiu采纳,获得10
30秒前
小缪完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
光锥之外完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
32秒前
Hello应助游佩君采纳,获得10
33秒前
33秒前
凭什么发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
传奇3应助叫滚滚采纳,获得10
34秒前
隐形曼青应助ZZZaa采纳,获得10
36秒前
36秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.).. Frederic G. Reamer 1070
Alloy Phase Diagrams 1000
Introduction to Early Childhood Education 1000
2025-2031年中国兽用抗生素行业发展深度调研与未来趋势报告 1000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 891
Historical Dictionary of British Intelligence (2014 / 2nd EDITION!) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5425117
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4539252
关于积分的说明 14166344
捐赠科研通 4456403
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2444186
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1435189
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1412553