Various methods going beyond density-functional theory (DFT), such as DFT+U, hybrid functionals, meta-GGAs, GW, and DFT-embedded dynamical mean field theory (eDMFT), have been developed to describe the electronic structure of correlated materials, but it is unclear how accurate these methods can be expected to be when applied to a given strongly correlated solid. It is thus of pressing interest to compare their accuracy as they apply to different categories of materials. Here, we introduce a novel paradigm in which a chosen set of beyond-DFT methods is systematically and uniformly tested on a chosen class of materials. For a first application, we choose the target materials to be the binary transition-metal oxides FeO, CoO, MnO, and NiO in their antiferromagnetic phase and present a head-to-head comparison of spectral properties as computed using the various methods. We also compare with available experimental angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES), inverse-photoemission spectroscopy, and with optical absorption. We find both B3LYP and eDMFT can reproduce the experiments quite well, with eDMFT doing best in particular when comparing with the ARPES data.