反应性(心理学)
共价键
化学
配体(生物化学)
计算化学
加合物
溶剂化
组合化学
质子亲和力
质子
分子
有机化学
生物化学
离子
受体
替代医学
物理
病理
医学
量子力学
质子化
作者
Angus Voice,Gary Tresadern,Herman van Vlijmen,Adrian J. Mulholland
标识
DOI:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00404
摘要
Covalent inhibition has undergone a resurgence and is an important modern-day drug design and chemical biology approach. To avoid off-target interactions and to fine-tune reactivity, the ability to accurately predict reactivity is vitally important for the design and development of safer and more effective covalent drugs. Several ligand-only metrics have been proposed that promise quick and simple ways of determining covalent reactivity. In particular, we examine proton affinity and reaction energies calculated with the density functional B3LYP-D3/6-311+G**//B3LYP-D3/6-31G* method to assess the reactivity of a series of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds that form covalent adducts with cysteine. We demonstrate that while these metrics correlate well with experiment for a diverse range of small reactive molecules these approaches fail for predicting the reactivity of drug-like compounds. We conclude that ligand-only metrics such as proton affinity and reaction energies do not capture determinants of reactivity in situ and fail to account for important factors such as conformation, solvation, and intermolecular interactions.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI