测量不变性
可比性
公制(单位)
统计
拟合优度
心理测量学
验证性因素分析
探索性因素分析
样品(材料)
样本量测定
计量经济学
空模式
数学
计算机科学
结构方程建模
工程类
组合数学
化学
色谱法
运营管理
作者
Laura Jamison,Hudson Golino,Alexander P. Christensen
标识
DOI:10.31234/osf.io/j4rx9
摘要
Establishing measurement invariance (MI) is vital to ensure applicability and comparability across groups (or time points) in psychological measurement. If MI is violated, differences between groups could be due to measurement rather than true differences between groups. Factor analytic methods are commonly used to test MI; however, many existing methods have reduced power to detect MI due to model misspecification (e.g., noninvariant referent indicators, reliance on data-driven methods). Literature reviews on MI studies have reported inaccurate or inadequately described models with modeling errors primarily predicted by software choice. Another reduction in power may be due to goodness of fit measures when group sample sizes vary. Network psychometrics methods to test MI are limited and primarily focus on partial correlation differences. In the present research, we propose a novel network psychometrics method to test MI within the Exploratory Graph Analysis framework. This method leverages so-called network loadings by calculating their differences between groups and uses permutation testing to stasitically compare these differences to the permutated null distribution. A simulation study was conducted using data structures common in psychological research (factor models) that included unequal group sample sizes. The proposed network psychometrics method demonstrated comparable ability to factor analytic methods in detecting MI, with some improvement in certain conditions such as lower noninvariance effect sizes in smaller or unequal sample sizes.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI