医学
假关节
矢状面
棒
截骨术
射线照相术
外科
畸形
减法
口腔正畸科
放射科
数学
算术
病理
替代医学
作者
Sachin Gupta,Murat Şakir Ekşi̇,Christopher P. Ames,Vedat Deviren,Blythe Durbin‐Johnson,Justin S. Smith,Munish C. Gupta
出处
期刊:Operative Neurosurgery
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2017-07-07
卷期号:14 (4): 449-456
被引量:92
摘要
Abstract BACKGROUND Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) can be used to treat rigid sagittal plane deformities. Nonunions and rod breakages are known complications of PSO. OBJECTIVE To assess outcomes of 2 methods of posterior instrumentation for PSO, traditional 2 rods vs a novel 4-rod technique in which 2 additional rods span only the osteotomy level. METHODS This study was a retrospective, radiographic review of consecutive PSOs performed at 2 centers. The primary difference in technique between the centers was the use of 4 rods including 2 independent rods attached only to the vertebral levels immediately adjacent to the PSO (group 1, n = 29 patients) vs the traditional 2-rod technique (group 2, n = 20 patients). RESULTS Demographics and preoperative to postoperative radiographic measurements were similar between the study groups, including the PSO wedge resection angle ( P = .56). The rod breakage rate was 25% with 2 rods and 0% with 4 rods ( P = .008), and the pseudarthrosis rate with 2 rods was 25% and with 4 rods was 3.4% ( P = .035). The patient with pseudarthrosis from group 1 had an infection and developed pseudarthrosis only after instrumentation removal. Rates of other complications did not differ significantly between the study groups. CONCLUSION This study provides a comparison between 2 techniques for rod placement across a PSO and suggests that the described novel 4-rod technique may help to reduce the rates of pseudarthrosis and rod failure. It will be important to confirm these findings in a prospectively designed study with multiple institutions in order to better control for potentially confounding factors.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI