作者
Martin G. Sanda,Ziding Feng,David H. Howard,Scott A. Tomlins,Lori J. Sokoll,Daniel W. Chan,Meredith M. Regan,Jack Groskopf,Jonathan Chipman,Dattatraya Patil,Simpa S. Salami,Douglas S. Scherr,Jacob Kagan,Sudhir Srivastava,Ian M. Thompson,Javed Siddiqui,Jing Fan,Aron Y. Joon,Leonidas E. Bantis,Mark A. Rubin,Arul M. Chinnayian,John T. Wei,Mohamed Bidair,Adam S. Kibel,Daniel Lin,Yair Lotan,Alan W. Partin,Samir S. Taneja
摘要
Importance
Potential survival benefits from treating aggressive (Gleason score, ≥7) early-stage prostate cancer are undermined by harms from unnecessary prostate biopsy and overdiagnosis of indolent disease. Objective
To evaluate the a priori primary hypothesis that combined measurement ofPCA3andTMPRSS2:ERG(T2:ERG) RNA in the urine after digital rectal examination would improve specificity over measurement of prostate-specific antigen alone for detecting cancer with Gleason score of 7 or higher. As a secondary objective, to evaluate the potential effect of such urine RNA testing on health care costs. Design, Setting, and Participants
Prospective, multicenter diagnostic evaluation and validation in academic and community-based ambulatory urology clinics. Participants were a referred sample of men presenting for first-time prostate biopsy without preexisting prostate cancer: 516 eligible participants from among 748 prospective cohort participants in the developmental cohort and 561 eligible participants from 928 in the validation cohort. Interventions/Exposures
UrinaryPCA3andT2:ERGRNA measurement before prostate biopsy. Main Outcomes and Measures
Presence of prostate cancer having Gleason score of 7 or higher on prostate biopsy. Pathology testing was blinded to urine assay results. In the developmental cohort, a multiplex decision algorithm was constructed using urine RNA assays to optimize specificity while maintaining 95% sensitivity for predicting aggressive prostate cancer at initial biopsy. Findings were validated in a separate multicenter cohort via prespecified analysis, blinded per prospective-specimen-collection, retrospective-blinded-evaluation (PRoBE) criteria. Cost effects of the urinary testing strategy were evaluated by modeling observed biopsy results and previously reported treatment outcomes. Results
Among the 516 men in the developmental cohort (mean age, 62 years; range, 33-85 years) combining testing of urinaryT2:ERGandPCA3at thresholds that preserved 95% sensitivity for detecting aggressive prostate cancer improved specificity from 18% to 39%. Among the 561 men in the validation cohort (mean age, 62 years; range, 27-86 years), analysis confirmed improvement in specificity (from 17% to 33%; lower bound of 1-sided 95% CI, 0.73%; prespecified 1-sidedP = .04), while high sensitivity (93%) was preserved for aggressive prostate cancer detection. Forty-two percent of unnecessary prostate biopsies would have been averted by using the urine assay results to select men for biopsy. Cost analysis suggested that this urinary testing algorithm to restrict prostate biopsy has greater potential cost-benefit in younger men. Conclusions and Relevance
Combined urinary testing forT2:ERGandPCA3can avert unnecessary biopsy while retaining robust sensitivity for detecting aggressive prostate cancer with consequent potential health care cost savings.