The Gastroscopy RAte of Cleanliness Evaluation (GRACE) Scale: an international reliability and validation study

医学 内窥镜检查 多中心研究 可靠性(半导体) 可视模拟标度 置信区间 内科学 胃肠病学 外科 量子力学 物理 功率(物理) 随机对照试验
作者
Gianluca Esposito,Emanuele Dilaghi,Cristina Santos,Irene Ligato,Investigators GRACE,Bruno Annibale,Mário Dinis‐Ribeiro,Miguel Areia
出处
期刊:Endoscopy [Georg Thieme Verlag KG]
被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1055/a-2422-0856
摘要

Background and study aims: mucosal visualization during upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy can be impaired by the presence of foam, bubbles, and mucus. Some UGI endoscopy visibility scales were proposed but without a multicenter validation. This study aimed to develop and validate the Gastroscopy RAte of Cleanliness Evaluation (GRACE) scale. Patients and methods: a multicenter international cross-sectional study was conducted. The GRACE scale is based on a score from 0-worst to 3-excellent of esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, for a total ranging from 0 to 9. In the first phase, four expert endoscopists evaluated 60 selected images twice with a two-week interval; in the second phase, the same 60 images were scored twice by one expert and one non-expert endoscopist from 27 different Endoscopy Departments worldwide. For reproducibility assessment and clinical validation, a real-time scale application was performed on consecutive patients undergoing gastroscopy in each center. Results: in the internal validation, the interobserver agreement was 0.81 (95%CI[0.73-0.87]) and 0.80 (95%CI[0.72-0.86]), with a reliability of 0.73 (95%CI[0.63-0.82]) and 0.72 (95%CI[0.63-0.81]), in the two rounds, respectively. In the external validation, the overall interobserver agreement was 0.85 (95%CI[0.82-0.88]) with a reliability of 0.79 (95%CI[0.73-0.84]). In the real-time evaluation phase, the overall percentage of correct classifications was 0.80 (95%CI[0.77-0.82]). Conclusions: the GRACE scale showed good interobserver agreement and reliability and good validity. The spread of this scale could enhance the quality and standardize the cleanliness of the mucosa assessment during UGI endoscopy, pushing endoscopists to obtain excellent visibility and reducing the risk of missing lesions.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wu完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
hh完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
酥饼完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
呆萌的荔枝完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Lucas应助诚心的寻凝采纳,获得10
5秒前
1123完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
lili123完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
高兴的怀梦完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
huan发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
向阳完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
白子双完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
新星完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
心灵美咖啡豆完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
高荣欣发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
16秒前
16秒前
xiaoxin完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
SciGPT应助无语的大门采纳,获得10
17秒前
KristenStewart完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
19秒前
蜗牛发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
ric发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
穆清完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
李健的小迷弟应助tangyuan采纳,获得10
24秒前
崔宏玺发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
英姑应助wuliqun采纳,获得10
26秒前
Ashmitte完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
huan完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
cjjwei完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
Lucas应助小稻草人采纳,获得10
28秒前
Sakura发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
一枪入魂完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
31秒前
31秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.).. Frederic G. Reamer 1070
Introduction to Early Childhood Education 1000
2025-2031年中国兽用抗生素行业发展深度调研与未来趋势报告 1000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 871
The International Law of the Sea (fourth edition) 800
A Guide to Genetic Counseling, 3rd Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5419432
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4534672
关于积分的说明 14146386
捐赠科研通 4451261
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2441690
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1433244
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1410533