Factors associated with pain reporting and severity of pain in the prehospital setting

医学 疼痛评估 人口 格拉斯哥昏迷指数 物理疗法 队列 疼痛管理 内科学 麻醉 环境卫生
作者
Rory Quinn,Siobhán Masterson,David W. Willis,David Hennelly,Conor Deasy,Colm P. O’Donnell
标识
DOI:10.1177/27536386231162609
摘要

An effective pain management strategy requires understanding of the epidemiology of pain in the population of interest and accurate measurement upon which to base quality improvement plans. The aims of this study were to estimate the incidence of pain in the prehospital setting and to explore features that impact on (1) documentation of pain; (2) severity of pain reported by patients. This retrospective cohort study included 212,401 care episodes attended by National Ambulance Service practitioners during 2020. Descriptive analysis of patient and care episode characteristics and regression analyses for the outcomes pain recorded and severity of pain were performed. We also used text pattern-matching of the notes field to estimate the proportion of patients in pain for whom a pain score assessment had not been documented. Sixty-five percent of all patients had a pain score documented and 29.5% were in pain (11% in severe pain). Likelihood of pain being recorded was most strongly associated with: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score, working diagnosis of the patient, location of the incident, and patient age. Likelihood of pain severity was most strongly associated with: transport status of patient, GCS score, and patient age. We treated missing data as a separate category and found consistent associations between the outcomes and missing data. We also found that pain was a symptom in approximately 15% of cases where no formal pain score assessment was documented. The data showed associations between routinely collected variables and the likelihood of pain recording and pain severity. Our findings also demonstrate the impact of missing data. To mitigate missing data impact, we suggest that EMS agencies consider making pain score assessment a mandatory requirement of their reporting for every patient. We also recommend that services report the extent and impact of missing data when measuring clinical performance.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zzz完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
dktrrrr完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
3秒前
3秒前
ccc完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
萧秋灵完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
缓慢冥幽完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
旺仔同学完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
吉以寒完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
科研老兵完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
fys131415完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
执着的忆雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
49秒前
闵不悔完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
阳光火车完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
cc完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
合适的寄灵完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
科研通AI5应助cc采纳,获得10
1分钟前
铜泰妍完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
贝贝完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Lrcx完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Wen完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
盘尼西林完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
LOVE0077完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
zhao完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
BINBIN完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
ambrose37完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
fufufu123完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
开心的大娘完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
www完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
末末完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
无为完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
白嫖论文完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
上官若男应助忧伤的步美采纳,获得10
2分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038039
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575756
关于积分的说明 11373782
捐赠科研通 3305574
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819239
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892655
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022