检查表
团队合作
医学
干预(咨询)
患者安全
介绍
医疗急救
心理学
医学教育
护理部
医疗保健
政治学
法学
经济
认知心理学
经济增长
作者
James C. Etheridge,Rachel Moyal‐Smith,Shu Rong Lim,Tze Tein Yong,Hiang Khoon Tan,Yves Sonnay,Mary E. Brindle,Christine Lim,Sarah Rothbard,Eleanor J. Murray,Joaquim M. Havens
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.018
摘要
Clear communication around surgical device use is crucial to patient safety. We evaluated the utility of the Device Briefing Tool (DBT) as an adjunct to the Surgical Safety Checklist.A nonrandomized, controlled pilot of the DBT was conducted with surgical teams at an academic referral center. Intervention departments used the DBT in all cases involving a surgical device for 10 wk. Utility, relative advantage, and implementation effectiveness were evaluated via surveys. Trained observers assessed adherence and team performance using the Oxford NOTECHS system.Of 113 individuals surveyed, 91 responded. Most respondents rated the DBT as moderately to extremely useful. Utility was greatest for complex devices (89%) and new devices (88%). Advantages included insight into the team's familiarity with devices (70%) and improved teamwork and communication (68%). Users found it unrealistic to review all device instructional materials (54%). Free text responses suggested that the DBT heightened awareness of deficiencies in device familiarity and training but lacked a clear mechanism to correct them. DBT adherence was 82%. NOTECHS scores in intervention departments improved over the course of the study but did not significantly differ from comparator departments.The DBT was rated highly by both surgeons and nurses. Adherence was high and we found no evidence of "checklist fatigue." Centers interested in implementing the DBT should focus on devices that are complex or new to any surgical team member. Guidance for correcting deficiencies identified by the DBT will be provided in future iterations of the tool.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI