垄断
成文法
权利(公平分配)
知识产权
订单(交换)
业务
市场支配力
职位(财务)
竞争对手分析
法律与经济学
范围(计算机科学)
产业组织
佣金
竞争法
法学
垄断
经济
市场经济
政治学
营销
微观经济学
程序设计语言
计算机科学
财务
标识
DOI:10.1093/jaenfo/jnac025
摘要
Abstract The interplay is reconstructed in an evolutionary perspective along three main stages. In the first one, Commission focused on IPRs holders’ power of disposition in order to prevent that profiting from the statutory ‘territorial scope’ of national exclusive rights, agreements were enacted partitioning the European market thus frustrating the goal of the Single Market. In the second phase, in order to avoid monopolization of top-level innovation, the statutory excludent power itself of holders of patents and copyrights on non-workably substitutable (thus ‘essential’) innovative solutions—and also holders of a dominant position—was tempered by a duty to grant access, on FRAND terms, to competitors willing licensees. In the third stage, in order to clear the market from ‘unworthy’ IPRs, thus ensuring a fairly competitive playing field, the attention focused on the acquisition itself of IPR entitlement and various forms of its anticompetitive misuse.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI