Methods for Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Technically Difficult Patients with Poor Imaging Quality

The assessment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function is often the most important information obtained during clinical echocardiography. Although LV systolic function may be visually estimated in many patients with or without contrast opacification, technically difficult patients may require alternative methods for evaluating LV systolic function. In this review, the authors describe several surrogate echocardiographic methods that might be helpful for the evaluation of LV systolic function in patients with poor image quality, including endocardial border delineation by contrast agents, mitral annular plane systolic excursion, mitral annular velocity derived from tissue Doppler, systolic time intervals, mitral regurgitation–derived LV dP/dt, and estimation of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography. After a short introduction to the various issues involved, the authors propose a method for suitable measurement. In addition, indications and clinical implications, as well as limitations, of the different methods are discussed. The assessment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function is often the most important information obtained during clinical echocardiography. Although LV systolic function may be visually estimated in many patients with or without contrast opacification, technically difficult patients may require alternative methods for evaluating LV systolic function. In this review, the authors describe several surrogate echocardiographic methods that might be helpful for the evaluation of LV systolic function in patients with poor image quality, including endocardial border delineation by contrast agents, mitral annular plane systolic excursion, mitral annular velocity derived from tissue Doppler, systolic time intervals, mitral regurgitation–derived LV dP/dt, and estimation of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography. After a short introduction to the various issues involved, the authors propose a method for suitable measurement. In addition, indications and clinical implications, as well as limitations, of the different methods are discussed.