主题(文档)
背景(考古学)
管理科学
研究设计
计算机科学
认识论
经济
社会学
社会科学
生物
哲学
古生物学
图书馆学
作者
Gary Charness,Uri Gneezy,Michael Kuhn
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009
摘要
a b s t r a c t In this article we explore the issues that surround within-subject and between-subject designs. We describe experiments in economics and in psychology that make comparisons using either of these designs (or both) that sometimes yield the same results and some- times do not. The overall goal is to establish a framework for understanding which critical questions need to be asked about such experimental studies, what authors of such studies can do to ameliorate fears of confoundedness, and which scenarios are particularly suscep- tible to divergent results from the two approaches. Overall, we find that both designs have their merits, and the choice of designs should be carefully considered in the context of the question being studied and in terms of the practical implementation of the research study. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI