怨恨
中国化
民族
中国
恐怖主义
政治学
社会学
宗教自由
伊斯兰教
身份(音乐)
民族中心主义
不平等
性别研究
政治经济学
法学
政治
地理
物理
马克思主义哲学
数学分析
考古
数学
声学
标识
DOI:10.1080/15570274.2023.2200277
摘要
This article assesses the effectiveness of religious freedom as a framework in international relations for its ability to define the issue in Xinjiang and propose solutions. In defining the problem, religious minorities other than Muslims, such as Christians, are ignored. This prevents social awareness and policy from addressing the issue, and fosters the Muslim majority to appropriate the Uyghur identity, marginalizing the non-Muslim religious minorities. Moreover, other identities (e.g. national, ethnic or linguistic) and causes of the conflict (e.g. socio-economic inequalities or historical resentment) are often overlooked. In solving the problem, no solutions are proposed to the underlying issue (separatist movements). On the other hand, China’s alternative framework defines the problem (terrorism, separatism, and extremism) and provides the basis from which to propose (savage) solutions: sinicization.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI