An Industry Perspective on the Use of Novel Excipients in Lipid Nanoparticles—Nonclinical Considerations

透视图(图形) 纳米颗粒 化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 材料科学 人工智能
作者
Lorrene A. Buckley,Jessica E. Sutherland,Prachi Borude,Karine Broudic,Philippe Collin,Aimee Hillegas,Chris Maclauchlin,Amer F. Saleh,Amy Sharma,Justina M. Thomas,Matthew N. O’Brien
出处
期刊:International Journal of Toxicology [SAGE]
卷期号:44 (3): 196-210
标识
DOI:10.1177/10915818251320631
摘要

Nucleic acid drug delivery with lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations has enabled the development of novel therapeutics and vaccines. LNP formulations are composed of both naturally occurring and synthetic lipid excipients. This perspective shares current practices in the nonclinical safety assessment of novel lipid excipients contained in LNP formulations and identifies gaps in current regulatory guidance on this topic. There is no globally harmonized regulatory guidance for the nonclinical safety assessment of novel excipients or guidance specific to safety testing of novel excipients in LNPs. Given the complexity of these LNP formulations, most nonclinical safety studies to support development are conducted with the drug product or with a LNP that contains non-active cargo. Three case studies (Onpattro ® , Comirnaty ® , and SpikeVax ® ) highlight that specific assessments may differ depending on the encapsulated modality, the intended use (e.g., therapeutic versus preventative vaccine), dose, and frequency of dosing. These case studies also suggest that regulatory agencies are open to scientific rationale to justify why certain tests should or should not be performed. As more products are approved, it will be important to understand how precedents set for approved products can be leveraged and what additional unique strategies may be applied to ensure nonclinical safety assessments are predictive, relevant, and meaningful for human safety. Proactive alignment with regulatory authorities will be critical in this context, especially as new approaches are proposed. Guidance documents may need to be revised or created as more experience is acquired to reflect the unique considerations for these novel excipients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
仔仔发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
MildW发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
4秒前
火星上小蚂蚁完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
riverhj完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
SciGPT应助栗子采纳,获得10
7秒前
小马哥完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
害羞外套发布了新的文献求助20
8秒前
9秒前
呵呵壕应助riverhj采纳,获得10
9秒前
萱瑄爸爸完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
夜安完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
kilion发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
李男孩完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
无头骑士完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Qz发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Hello应助郭娅楠采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
追逐者发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
赘婿应助专注的故事采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
黄小北发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
wanci应助无聊的幻露采纳,获得10
19秒前
lifeboast完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
谢圣林完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
shelia发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
小二郎应助lifeboast采纳,获得10
21秒前
22秒前
追逐者完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
23秒前
nk完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
24秒前
廿五完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
Qz完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6018535
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7607517
关于积分的说明 16159358
捐赠科研通 5166108
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2765198
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1746765
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1635364