Comparative effectiveness of pulsed field ablation and cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 烧蚀 心房颤动 荟萃分析 心脏病学 心脏消融 内科学 导管消融
作者
Marta V. Freitas,Larissa Araújo de Lucena,C Guida,Elísio Bulhões,Ricardo D’Oliveira Vieira,Isabelle Batista Donadon,Maria Esther Barbalho,Manuel Vilela,D Cazeiro,Dulce Brito,Joana Rodrigues Dantas
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:45 (Supplement_1)
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.376
摘要

Abstract Background Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is a well-established technique for treating atrial fibrillation (AF), with a low complication rate related to cryoenergy-induced lesions. Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) has emerged as a non-thermal alternative, with promising potential to further reduce complications. Purpose We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of PFA versus CBA in patients with AF. Methods We conducted a systematic search across PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies published between 2013 and 2024 that compared PFA and CBA ablation techniques in patients with AF. Statistical analysis was carried out utilizing RevMan 5.1.7. Heterogeneity was assessed with I² statistics; p-values inferior to 0.05 and I²>25% were considered as significant heterogeneity. Results A total of 840 studies were screened in the initial search, and 26 studies were selected for full-text review based on inclusion criteria. Out of these, 8 observational studies involving 3,113 patients were included. Among these, 1,088 (34.9%) underwent PFA, while 2,025 (65.0%) underwent CBA. Periprocedural complications were significantly lower in patients who underwent PFA compared with the CBA group (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.74; p=0.001; I²=1%; Fig. 1A). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in procedure time in the PFA group (MD -8.21 min; 95% CI -13.74 to -2.69; p=0.004; I²=96%; Fig. 1B). However, no statistically significant difference was observed among groups regarding fluoroscopy time (MD 1.63 min; 95% CI -0.22 to 3.48; p=0.08; I²=92%; Fig. 2A), or recurrence of atrial arrhythmias after the blanking period (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.04; p=0.12; I²=6%; Fig. 2B). Additionally, a subgroup analysis involving only propensity score-matched cohorts was conducted but didn’t show any statistical difference for any outcomes evaluated. Conclusion In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PFA was associated with a lower risk of periprocedural complications and a shorter procedure duration, compared to CBA in patients with AF. Additionally, it didn’t show a potential for reducing the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias, and the data regarding fluoroscopy time were inconclusive.Primary outcomesSecondary outcomes
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小火苗发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
kurisu完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
LZQ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
Xiaoxiao应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
3秒前
3秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
无恙发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
含糊的茹妖完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
微笑晓丝完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
JamesPei应助罗大壮采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
lkkkkkk完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
科研通AI2S应助LC采纳,获得10
6秒前
Rondab应助洪焕良采纳,获得10
6秒前
ling完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
cacaldon发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
日出发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
幸运周一完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
ZZC发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
柚子成精完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
lkkkkkk发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
manan发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
搞怪莫茗发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
桐桐应助kryptonite采纳,获得10
12秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 700
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Effective Learning and Mental Wellbeing 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3975986
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3520289
关于积分的说明 11202025
捐赠科研通 3256778
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1798453
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 877605
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 806482