德拉姆
符号
泄漏(经济)
算法
数学
分析化学(期刊)
计算机科学
化学
算术
色谱法
几何学
经济
宏观经济学
作者
Nosheen Shahzadi,Myungsang Park,Donghyuk Yun,Sanghyeon Baeg
标识
DOI:10.1109/ted.2022.3159496
摘要
This article reveals the leakage mechanisms corresponding to the dominant leakage path of individual tail cells in $2\times $ nm technology double data rate (DDR)4 DRAM at operating temperature. For leakage path determination, activation energy ( ${E}_{a}$ ) was used as a tool through its extraction by retention time measurement. To get a wide distribution of ${E}_{a}$ , retention testing was performed at the target retention time (10, 15, 20, or 25 s); during this, the number of retentions failed cells were recorded with each temperature. In this experiment, 1.65 e −2 % of the selected bank cells found retention failures. From the total retention failed cells, the selected commonly retention failed cells at the target retention times comprise 1.5 e −3 % of the selected bank cells. From commonly retention failed cells, the distribution of ${E}_{a}$ is analyzed with the retention time at room temperature. This analysis reveals that subthreshold, junction, and gate-induced drain leakage (GIDL) leakage paths dominate in 3.48%, 93.89%, and 2.61% of the total retention failed cells, respectively, at room temperature. Using another experimental approach, retention testing performed at operating temperature on selected 0.07-ppm retention tail cells concludes that GIDL is the dominant leakage path in this device. Correlation between ${E}_{a}$ and retention time measured at operating temperature (40 °C, 60 °C, or 80 °C) explored the leakage mechanisms corresponding to ${E}_{a}$ of the extracted dominant leakage path (GIDL). These failure leakage mechanisms, dominating on certain values of operating temperature, are divulged as the root cause of failure at that temperature.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI