mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine and oral lichen planus: A case report

医学 口腔扁平苔藓 口腔粘膜 颊粘膜 口炎 口腔给药 皮肤病科 养生 不利影响 口腔医学 内科学 口腔 病理 牙科
作者
Mario Caggiano,Massimo Amato,Federica Di Spirito,Marzio Galdi,Laura Sisalli
出处
期刊:Oral Diseases [Wiley]
卷期号:28 (S2): 2624-2626 被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.1111/odi.14184
摘要

BNT162b2 (Comirnaty) is a vaccine against COVID-19, based on messenger RiboNucleic Acid (m-RNA) technology, capable of encoding for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which is responsible for viral binding to target human cells (Polack et al., 2020). On December 10, 2020, a clinical trial, published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), reported that two-dose regimen of Comirnaty vaccine was 95% effective in preventing COVID-19 (Polack et al., 2020). However, vaccine efficacy estimate has changed in relation to the time interval from the last administration and as a result of the circulation of new viral variants (Bian et al., 2021; Fiolet et al., 2021). Serious adverse reactions have only been reported in the 0.7% of cases; mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site was the most frequently self-reported local reaction, while fever and fatigue were the main systemic ones (Thomas et al., 2021). In June 2021, a 40-year-old male patient complained the appearance of bilateral lesions in buccal mucosa, 1 month after the administration of the second dose of Comirnaty vaccine. Oral cavity examination revealed good oral hygiene, two dental amalgam fillings on the upper first molars and confirmed the presence of keratotic reticular patches as well as of erythematous and erosive lesions on the buccal mucosa of both cheeks. Macroscopic appearance of the oral lesions was compatible with the diagnosis of oral lichen planus (OLP). In order to assess the presence of systemic alterations as potential causes of the immunological reaction, appropriate hematochemical tests were prescribed; to confirm the clinical diagnosis, an incisional biopsy was performed (Alrashdan et al., 2016) (Figure 1d). Laboratory tests, shown in Figure 1a,b,c, resulted negative, while histopathological findings (Figure 1e) were suggestive of OLP (Ismail et al., 2007). In proximity to the oral mucosa, mercury or other amalgam components may trigger a type IV/delayed hypersensitivity immune section (Alrashdan et al., 2016). For this reason, the amalgam fillings were replaced and a follow-up was scheduled. No clinical improvement of the oral lesions was observed after 6 months, excluding the possibility that amalgam could be considered the causative antigen. Oral lichen planus is a chronic cell-mediated inflammatory reaction, where CD8 cytotoxic lymphocytes play the main role against an unknown keratinocyte antigen, which is no longer recognized as self (Edwards & Kelsch, 2002); therefore, related lesions can be considered as the expression of different diseases and several local conditions, secondary to the loss of the immunological tolerance (Ismail et al., 2007). A drug-related lichenoid reaction tends to develop from 1 month to 2 years after the first intake of the drug (Woo et al., 2009). Specific scientific evidence on post-vaccine lichenoid reactions showed that the reaction occurred with a mean time of 14 days (Lai & Yew, 2017). Given these considerations, it could be hypothesized that the inoculation of the second dose of vaccine could have triggered a cell-mediated reaction responsible for the genesis of the lesions described. To our knowledge, although OLP has been recently related to a vector-based COVID-19 vaccination (Ad26. COV2.S) (Troeltzsch et al., 2021), no OLP lesions have ever been described in association with m-RNA vaccines and the presented case may be considered as the first report appearing in the literature. Further clinical observations and wider studies with higher scientific evidence are evidently needed to validate such a finding and the putative role of m-RNA vaccines in OLP pathogenesis. None. All the authors declare that no conflict of interest or financial relationship regarding any of the products involved in this study. Mario Caggiano: Conceptualization; Data curation; Validation; Visualization; Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing. Massimo Amato: Supervision; Validation; Visualization. Federica Di Spirito: Visualization; Writing – review & editing. Marzio Galdi: Data curation; Writing – original draft. Laura Sisalli: Conceptualization; Supervision; Validation; Visualization. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal. The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/odi.14184. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
xiaoxin发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Akim应助清脆的靖仇采纳,获得10
刚刚
yull完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
甜甜十三完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
小妮子完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
wanci应助好吃的蛋挞采纳,获得10
5秒前
闪闪灯泡完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
Allen完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
徐茂瑜完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
研友_LMBAXn发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
linxiang发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
gentleman完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
bbow发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
传奇3应助晞嘻采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
11秒前
研友_X89o6n完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
于鱼发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
好吃发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
何hehe完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
linxiang完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
诩诩发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
18秒前
左白易完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
科研通AI2S应助宋佳采纳,获得10
19秒前
mojibunny完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
虚幻初之完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
桃酥完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
chen发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Leon完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
orixero应助超级的身影采纳,获得10
20秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Microlepidoptera Palaearctica, Volumes 1 and 3 - 13 (12-Volume Set) [German] 1122
Дружба 友好报 (1957-1958) 1000
The Data Economy: Tools and Applications 1000
Mantiden - Faszinierende Lauerjäger – Buch gebraucht kaufen 700
PraxisRatgeber Mantiden., faszinierende Lauerjäger. – Buch gebraucht kaufe 700
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3101245
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2752689
关于积分的说明 7620005
捐赠科研通 2404773
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1275998
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 616673
版权声明 599058