医学
乳腺摄影术
乳腺癌
奇纳
乳腺癌筛查
梅德林
科克伦图书馆
乳房密度
乳房磁振造影
乳腺超声检查
磁共振成像
人口
妇科
超声波
医学物理学
产科
放射科
癌症
荟萃分析
内科学
护理部
心理干预
法学
政治学
环境卫生
作者
Patricia Ravert,Crystal Huffaker
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00564.x
摘要
Abstract Purpose : To (a) conduct a thorough search of the literature for breast cancer screening studies utilizing mammography, ultrasound, or breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (b) critically appraise these studies to aid the nurse practitioner in choosing the most appropriate screening tool for their individual patients. Data sources : Articles were identified from the following databases: CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, EBSCO, ISI, and Cochrane Library. Reference lists from all articles were reviewed and an authority in breast cancer screening was contacted regarding the reference list. Conclusions : Breast MRI had a higher sensitivity than mammography and ultrasound in all studies comparing breast MRI. The specificity was lower for breast MRI than for mammography in five out of six studies. The ultrasound had a higher sensitivity than mammography in all five studies examining women with dense breast tissue. Implications for practice : Women who fall into high‐risk categories should be screened yearly with breast MRI and mammography. Women with dense breast tissue according to a standardized density score should be screened yearly with ultrasound and mammography. Women in the general population should be screened yearly with mammography.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI