补体
语言学
补语(音乐)
动词
情态动词
心理学
从属从句
主题化
对话
计算机科学
哲学
判决
化学
互补
表型
基因
生物化学
作者
Sandra A. Thompson,Anthony Mulac
标识
DOI:10.1016/0378-2166(91)90012-m
摘要
The complementizer that in English, as in I heard (that) you were sick, has widely been regarded as optional. Our research demonstrates that the use of that in such utterances in conversation is highly related to various other features in the discourse. First and second person subjects, the verbs think and guess, and auxiliaries, indirect objects, and adverbs in the main clause, and pronominal complement subjects are all significant in predicting the use of that. As seemingly disparate as these factors are, their influence finds a unified explanation in the acknowledgement that certain combinations of main clause subjects and verbs in English (such as I think) are being reanalyzed as unitary epistemic phrases. As this happens, the distinction between ‘main’ and ‘complement’ clauses is being eroded, with the omission of that a strong concomitant. Our findings show that the factors most likely to contribute to this reanalysis are precisely those which relate either to the epistemicity of the main subject and verb or to the topicality of the complement at the expense of the main clause.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI