护理部
心理干预
优先次序
护理管理
背景(考古学)
护理干预分类
护理结果分类
单位(环理论)
差异(会计)
干预(咨询)
情境伦理学
护理
医学
心理学
初级护理
护士教育
过程管理
业务
数学教育
古生物学
会计
生物
社会心理学
作者
Alvisa Palese,Michela Bottega,Alice Cescutti,Davide Caruzzo,Matteo Danielis,Stefano Fabris,Elisa Mattiussi,Luca Grassetti
摘要
Aims To highlight (a) trends common to all nurses on priorities attributed to interventions, and (b) whether there are profiles of nurses working in the same context who prioritize interventions in a similar way. Background The underlying prioritization of interventions leading to unfinished nursing care has been minimally investigated. Methods A 2017 pilot Q methodology study. Full-time nurses, with at least 6 months of experience in a surgical unit, were involved. Eleven nurses rated the priority given in daily practice (from −3 as the lowest to +3 as the highest) to 35 Q-sample statements representing nursing care, non-nursing and organisational interventions. Results Overall, the intervention receiving the lowest priority was 'Providing patient hygiene', while the highest was 'Answering phone calls'. In the by-person factor analysis (total variance = 60.79%), three profiles of nurses emerged, (a) 'Patient safety-oriented' (variance = 31.66%); (b) 'Nursing task-oriented' (=16.32%); and (c) 'Team process-oriented' (=12.81%). Conclusions Three profiles of nurses emerged in the same setting with significant differences both in the statistical order of priorities and in their practical implications. Implications for nursing management Understanding levels of prioritization, which are not only affected by the unit but also by sub-groups of nurses who rank priorities in a similar way, can support nurse managers in their role.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI