Safety and efficacy of amantadine, modafinil, and methylphenidate for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover, double-blind trial

莫达非尼 金刚烷胺 安慰剂 交叉研究 哌醋甲酯 医学 物理疗法 随机对照试验 内科学 精神科 药理学 注意缺陷多动障碍 病理 替代医学
作者
Bardia Nourbakhsh,Nisha Revirajan,Bridget Morris,Christian Cordano,Jennifer M. Creasman,Michael Manguinao,Kristen M. Krysko,Alice Rutatangwa,Caroline Auvray,Salman Aljarallah,Chengshi Jin,Ellen M. Mowry,Charles E. McCulloch,Emmanuelle Waubant
出处
期刊:Lancet Neurology [Elsevier]
卷期号:20 (1): 38-48 被引量:118
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30354-9
摘要

Background Methylphenidate, modafinil, and amantadine are commonly prescribed medications for alleviating fatigue in multiple sclerosis; however, the evidence supporting their efficacy is sparse and conflicting. Our goal was to compare the efficacy of these three medications with each other and placebo in patients with multiple sclerosis fatigue. Methods In this randomised, placebo-controlled, four-sequence, four-period, crossover, double-blind trial, patients with multiple sclerosis who reported fatigue and had a Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) score of more than 33 were recruited at two academic multiple sclerosis centres in the USA. Participants received oral amantadine (up to 100 mg twice daily), modafinil (up to 100 mg twice daily), methylphenidate (up to 10 mg twice daily), or placebo, each given for up to 6 weeks. All patients were intended to receive all four study medications, in turn, in one of four different sequences with 2-week washout periods between medications. A biostatistician prepared a concealed allocation schedule, stratified by site, randomly assigning a sequence of medications in approximately a 1:1:1:1 ratio, in blocks of eight, to a consecutive series of numbers. The statistician and pharmacists had no role in assessing the participants or collecting data, and the participants, caregivers, and assessors were masked to allocation. The primary outcome measure was the MFIS measured while taking the highest tolerated dose at week 5 of each medication period, analysed by use of a linear mixed-effect regression model. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03185065 and is closed. Findings Between Oct 4, 2017, and Feb 27, 2019, of 169 patients screened, 141 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of four medication administration sequences: 35 (25%) patients to the amantadine, placebo, modafinil, and methylphenidate sequence; 34 (24%) patients to the placebo, methylphenidate, amantadine, and modafinil sequence; 35 (25%) patients to the modafinil, amantadine, methylphenidate, and placebo sequence; and 37 (26%) patients to the methylphenidate, modafinil, placebo, and amantadine sequence. Data from 136 participants were available for the intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome. The estimated mean values of MFIS total scores at baseline and the maximal tolerated dose were as follows: 51·3 (95% CI 49·0–53·6) at baseline, 40·6 (38·2–43·1) with placebo, 41·3 (38·8–43·7) with amantadine, 39·0 (36·6–41·4) with modafinil, and 38·6 (36·2–41·0) with methylphenidate (p=0·20 for the overall medication effect in the linear mixed-effect regression model). As compared with placebo (38 [31%] of 124 patients), higher proportions of participants reported adverse events while taking amantadine (49 [39%] of 127 patients), modafinil (50 [40%] of 125 patients), and methylphenidate (51 [40%] of 129 patients). Three serious adverse events occurred during the study (pulmonary embolism and myocarditis while taking amantadine, and a multiple sclerosis exacerbation requiring hospital admission while taking modafinil). Interpretation Amantadine, modafinil, and methylphenidate were not superior to placebo in improving multiple sclerosis fatigue and caused more frequent adverse events. The results of this study do not support an indiscriminate use of amantadine, modafinil, or methylphenidate for the treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Funding Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wangayting发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
叮叮完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
3秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
深情安青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
Singularity应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
赘婿应助沉默的西牛采纳,获得10
4秒前
明理小凝完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
WCC完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
qmhx发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
研友_nxwBJL发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Frank完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
小二郎应助一路向南采纳,获得10
6秒前
stuffmatter应助韦小艺采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
小二郎应助迅速的花生采纳,获得10
8秒前
卢雨生发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
choubao完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
8777发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
WCC发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
li发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
年华完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
蓝蓝娜娜发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
FashionBoy应助卢雨生采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in ’Tides Chemistry 2000
Sustainability in ’Tides Chemistry 1500
Studien zur Ideengeschichte der Gesetzgebung 1000
The ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication 1000
TM 5-855-1(Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons) 1000
Handbook of the Mammals of the World – Volume 3: Primates 805
Ethnicities: Media, Health, and Coping 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3071772
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2725690
关于积分的说明 7490802
捐赠科研通 2373068
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1258410
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 610277
版权声明 596938