作者
Giovanni Marconi,Annalisa Talami,Maria Chiara Abbenante,Chiara Sartor,Sarah Parisi,Jacopo Nanni,Luca Bertamini,S Ragaini,Matteo Olivi,Stefano De Polo,Gianluca Cristiano,Maria Chiara Fontana,Maria Teresa Bochicchio,Emanuela Ottaviani,Mario Arpinati,Mariarosaria Sessa,Carmen Baldazzi,Lucia Caso,Nicoletta Testoni,Michele Baccarani,Francesca Bonifazi,Giovanni Martinelli,Stefania Paolini,Michèle Cavo,Cristina Papayannidis,Antonio Curti
摘要
Abstract Introduction Clinical response and chemosensitivity of relapse or refractory AML patients were evaluated after rescue and bridge‐to‐transplant MEC (mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine) regimen. Methods and Patients Fifty‐five consecutive AML patients were treated with MEC from 2009 to 2018. Chemosensitivity was evaluated by WT1 quantification. Results 27/55 patients (49.1%) had AML resistant to induction and 28/55 patients (50.9%) had AML relapse. 25/55 patients (45.5%) achieved a CR after one course of MEC, and 12 patients (21.8%) achieved WT1 negativity. In 12 patients, a second MEC was administered. Four out of 12 patients improved significantly their response with the 2nd MEC. MEC was an effective bridge to transplant, 32/55 patients (58.2%) received an allogenic stem cell transplant. Median overall survival (OS) from MEC was 455 days (95% CI 307‐602 days.); patient with WT1 negative CR had the best OS ( P <.000). Conclusion WT1 is a useful marker of chemosensitivity after MEC as rescue and bridge‐to‐transplant therapy.