纠正性反馈
第二语言写作
心理学
同行反馈
第二语言习得
书面语
背景(考古学)
对比度(视觉)
第二语言
数学教育
语言学
计算机科学
人工智能
生物
哲学
古生物学
作者
Hanadi Abdulrahman Khadawardi
出处
期刊:English Language Teaching
[Canadian Center of Science and Education]
日期:2020-12-29
卷期号:14 (1): 123-123
被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.5539/elt.v14n1p123
摘要
Debate about the value and the effect of both kinds of corrective feedback, explicit and implicit on second language writing has been prominent in recent years. Second language writing researchers investigate whether written implicit corrective feedback facilitates the acquisition of linguistic features. In contrast, L2 writing researchers generally emphasize the question of whether written corrective feedback helps student writers improve their writing texts and reduces their language errors. Understanding these differences is important because it provides guidelines for English language writing teachers on what are the best way to provide feedback for student writers. A quasi-experimental study was conducted to investigate the effects of implicit corrective feedback on the English writing of international second language learners in a UK educational context. It scrutinizes the application of teacher implicit written feedback in relation to the advancement of the writing skill of second language learners within a short-term period. A case study consisting of a small group of international students received implicit written feedback through codes representing specific types of writing errors. Participants were also interviewed to understand their views regarding teacher implicit written feedback and their reactions towards it. The results of the study revealed that teacher implicit written feedback helped correcting particular type of errors while other errors mandated the intervention of the teacher oral feedback.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI