Cell-based assays for the detection of MOG antibodies: a comparative study

医学 多发性硬化 抗体 髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白 效价 免疫学 神经学 视神经炎 胃肠病学 内科学 病理 精神科 实验性自身免疫性脑脊髓炎
作者
Matteo Gastaldi,Silvia Scaranzin,Sven Jarius,Brigitte Wildeman,Elisabetta Zardini,Giulia Mallucci,Eleonora Rigoni,Elisa Vegezzi,Thomas Foiadelli,Salvatore Savasta,Paola Banfi,Maurizio Versino,Luana Benedetti,Giovanni Novi,Margherita Maria Mancardi,Thea Giacomini,Pietro Annovazzi,Damiano Baroncini,Diana Ferraro,Vito Lampasona
出处
期刊:Journal of Neurology [Springer Nature]
卷期号:267 (12): 3555-3564 被引量:58
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00415-020-10024-0
摘要

The detection of antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) is fundamental for the identification of MOG antibody-associated disorders (MOGAD), and the differential diagnosis of acquired demyelinating syndromes of the CNS, among which multiple sclerosis (MS). We compared the diagnostic performance of four cell-based assays (CBAs) for their detection. Consecutive sera from 204 patients with ‘possible MOGAD’ (55), MS (112), and other neurological disorders (OND, 37) were tested for MOG-IgG with a live-CBA with anti-heavy-and-light chain secondary-antibody (LCBA-IgGH+L), and a live-CBA for IgG1 (LCBA-IgG1). A subgroup of 71 patients was additionally tested with a live-CBA with anti-Fcγ secondary-antibody (LCBA-IgGFcγ), and a commercial fixed-CBA with anti-Fcγ secondary-antibody (FCBA-IgGFcγ). Fifty-seven/204 patients (27.9%) were MOG-IgG-positive. Sensitivity was 89.1% (CI:77.8–95.9) and specificity 93.3% (CI:88.0–96.7) for LCBA-IgGH+L, and 74.6% (CI:61.0–85.3) and 100% (CI:97.6–100) for LCBA-IgG1. Eighteen of 57 (31%) samples showed discrepant results (all negative on LCBA-IgG1); of these, three with ‘possible MOGAD’ showed high-titer MOG-IgG (≥ 1:640), and positivity for MOG-IgG2, whereas 15/18 had low-titer MOG-IgG (1:160/1:320) and mixed diagnoses (5 ‘possible MOGAD’, 6 MS, 4 OND). In the subgroup analysis, sensitivity was 92.3% (CI:79.1–98.4) and specificity 97.0% (CI:83.8–99.9) for LCBA-IgGFcγ, and 87.2% (CI:72.6–95.7) and 97.0% (CI:83.8–99.9) for FCBA-IgGFcγ. LCBA-IgG1 showed the highest specificity but can miss MOG-IgG2 reactivities, whose meaning warrants further investigations. Titration of samples tested with LCBA-IgGH+L/ IgGFcγ is important for meaningful interpretation of the results. In the subgroup analysis, LCBA-IgGFcγ yielded the highest accuracy, and FCBA-IgGFcγ good specificity, but it was at risk of false-negative results.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
不得明月发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
maun222发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
3秒前
4秒前
欲见完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
Q_Q完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
9秒前
Ca完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
陈瑞发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
浮生梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
科目三应助霍金斯1990采纳,获得10
11秒前
深情安青应助lulu采纳,获得10
12秒前
热心市民小杨应助Q_Q采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
JamesPei应助摆烂的雨雨采纳,获得10
14秒前
mxm12138发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Lucas应助s_chui采纳,获得10
15秒前
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
Ava应助喜悦的一寡采纳,获得10
18秒前
默默松鼠完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
爆米花应助chi采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
完美大神完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
Jasper应助Yochamme采纳,获得10
20秒前
快乐咖啡完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
漂亮的保温杯完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
不得明月完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
Frank发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
英俊的铭应助PYL采纳,获得30
22秒前
活力的青枫发布了新的文献求助100
22秒前
哈哈悦完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
无花果应助ZZ采纳,获得10
24秒前
赘婿应助小慧儿采纳,获得10
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
VASCULITIS(血管炎)Rheumatic Disease Clinics (Clinics Review Articles) —— 《风湿病临床》(临床综述文章) 1000
Feldspar inclusion dating of ceramics and burnt stones 1000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 801
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5971712
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7288942
关于积分的说明 15992394
捐赠科研通 5109548
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2744066
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1709783
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1621760