Cell-based assays for the detection of MOG antibodies: a comparative study

医学 多发性硬化 抗体 髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白 效价 免疫学 神经学 视神经炎 胃肠病学 内科学 病理 精神科 实验性自身免疫性脑脊髓炎
作者
Matteo Gastaldi,Silvia Scaranzin,Sven Jarius,Brigitte Wildeman,Elisabetta Zardini,Giulia Mallucci,Eleonora Rigoni,Elisa Vegezzi,Thomas Foiadelli,Salvatore Savasta,Paola Banfi,Maurizio Versino,Luana Benedetti,Giovanni Novi,Margherita Maria Mancardi,Thea Giacomini,Pietro Annovazzi,Damiano Baroncini,Diana Ferraro,Vito Lampasona
出处
期刊:Journal of Neurology [Springer Nature]
卷期号:267 (12): 3555-3564 被引量:58
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00415-020-10024-0
摘要

The detection of antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) is fundamental for the identification of MOG antibody-associated disorders (MOGAD), and the differential diagnosis of acquired demyelinating syndromes of the CNS, among which multiple sclerosis (MS). We compared the diagnostic performance of four cell-based assays (CBAs) for their detection. Consecutive sera from 204 patients with ‘possible MOGAD’ (55), MS (112), and other neurological disorders (OND, 37) were tested for MOG-IgG with a live-CBA with anti-heavy-and-light chain secondary-antibody (LCBA-IgGH+L), and a live-CBA for IgG1 (LCBA-IgG1). A subgroup of 71 patients was additionally tested with a live-CBA with anti-Fcγ secondary-antibody (LCBA-IgGFcγ), and a commercial fixed-CBA with anti-Fcγ secondary-antibody (FCBA-IgGFcγ). Fifty-seven/204 patients (27.9%) were MOG-IgG-positive. Sensitivity was 89.1% (CI:77.8–95.9) and specificity 93.3% (CI:88.0–96.7) for LCBA-IgGH+L, and 74.6% (CI:61.0–85.3) and 100% (CI:97.6–100) for LCBA-IgG1. Eighteen of 57 (31%) samples showed discrepant results (all negative on LCBA-IgG1); of these, three with ‘possible MOGAD’ showed high-titer MOG-IgG (≥ 1:640), and positivity for MOG-IgG2, whereas 15/18 had low-titer MOG-IgG (1:160/1:320) and mixed diagnoses (5 ‘possible MOGAD’, 6 MS, 4 OND). In the subgroup analysis, sensitivity was 92.3% (CI:79.1–98.4) and specificity 97.0% (CI:83.8–99.9) for LCBA-IgGFcγ, and 87.2% (CI:72.6–95.7) and 97.0% (CI:83.8–99.9) for FCBA-IgGFcγ. LCBA-IgG1 showed the highest specificity but can miss MOG-IgG2 reactivities, whose meaning warrants further investigations. Titration of samples tested with LCBA-IgGH+L/ IgGFcγ is important for meaningful interpretation of the results. In the subgroup analysis, LCBA-IgGFcγ yielded the highest accuracy, and FCBA-IgGFcγ good specificity, but it was at risk of false-negative results.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
αβ完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
诸岩完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
Pursue完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Seamily给坦率纸飞机的求助进行了留言
5秒前
Tangwz完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
天天快乐应助科研民工采纳,获得10
6秒前
或无情发布了新的文献求助100
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
10秒前
十五完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
锦12138完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
嘻嘻ora发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
Frank发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Orange应助乐乱采纳,获得10
14秒前
1234sxcv发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
须眉交白完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
飘逸太英发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
睡觉完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
小柠檬完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
yyyyy语言发布了新的文献求助200
19秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Ya完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
22秒前
飘逸太英完成签到,获得积分20
23秒前
哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
科目三应助甜甜采纳,获得10
25秒前
ding应助或无情采纳,获得10
27秒前
ff完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
DoctorTa发布了新的文献求助30
27秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
偶尔三分糖完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
31秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
从k到英国情人 1500
Ägyptische Geschichte der 21.–30. Dynastie 1100
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1100
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5736721
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5367776
关于积分的说明 15333749
捐赠科研通 4880490
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2622881
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1571770
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1528585