严厉
定性研究
自反性
奖学金
质量(理念)
研究设计
管理科学
工程伦理学
可信赖性
数据收集
最佳实践
计算机科学
社会学
心理学
认识论
政治学
社会心理学
社会科学
工程类
哲学
法学
作者
Jessica L. Johnson,Donna Adkins,Sheila W. Chauvin
摘要
Attributes of rigor and quality and suggested best practices for qualitative research design as they relate to the steps of designing, conducting, and reporting qualitative research in health professions educational scholarship are presented. A research question must be clear and focused and supported by a strong conceptual framework, both of which contribute to the selection of appropriate research methods that enhance trustworthiness and minimize researcher bias inherent in qualitative methodologies. Qualitative data collection and analyses are often modified through an iterative approach to answering the research question. Researcher reflexivity, essentially a researcher’s insight into their own biases and rationale for decision-making as the study progresses, is critical to rigor. This article reviews common standards of rigor, quality scholarship criteria, and best practices for qualitative research from design through dissemination.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI