光学
显微镜
相位成像
分辨率(逻辑)
材料科学
相(物质)
计算机科学
纳米技术
物理
人工智能
量子力学
作者
Vicente Micó,Juanjuan Zheng,Javier Garcı́a,Zeev Zalevsky,Peng Gao
出处
期刊:Advances in Optics and Photonics
[The Optical Society]
日期:2019-03-19
卷期号:11 (1): 135-135
被引量:86
标识
DOI:10.1364/aop.11.000135
摘要
Quantitative phase microscopy (QPM), a technique combining phase imaging and microscopy, enables visualization of the 3D topography in reflective samples, as well as the inner structure or refractive index distribution of transparent and translucent samples. Similar to other imaging modalities, QPM is constrained by the conflict between numerical aperture (NA) and field of view (FOV): an imaging system with a low NA has to be employed to maintain a large FOV. This fact severely limits the resolution in QPM up to 0.82λ/NA, λ being the illumination wavelength. Consequently, finer structures of samples cannot be resolved by using modest NA objectives in QPM. Aimed to that, many approaches, such as oblique illumination, structured illumination, and speckle illumination (just to cite a few), have been proposed to improve the spatial resolution (or the space–bandwidth product) in phase microscopy by restricting other degrees of freedom (mostly time). This paper aims to provide an up-to-date review on the resolution enhancement approaches in QPM, discussing the pros and cons of each technique as well as the confusion on resolution definition claims on QPM and other coherent microscopy methods. Through this survey, we will review the most appealing and useful techniques for superresolution in coherent microscopy, working with and without lenses and with special attention to QPM. Note that, throughout this review, with the term "superresolution" we denote enhancing the resolution to surpass the limit imposed by diffraction and proportional to λ/NA, rather than the physics limit λ/(2n med ), with n med being the refractive index value of the immersion medium.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI