桑格测序
外显子组测序
工作流程
计算机科学
DNA测序
拷贝数变化
外显子组
计算生物学
基因组学
数据科学
生物
遗传学
数据库
基因
基因组
突变
作者
Iria Roca,Lorena González-Castro,Helena Fernández,María L. Couce,Ana Fernández‐Marmiesse
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.02.005
摘要
Copy number variants (CNVs) are intermediate-scale structural variants containing copy number changes involving DNA fragments of between 1 kb and 5 Mb. Although known to account for a significant proportion of the genetic burden in human disease, the role of CNVs (especially small CNVs) is often underestimated, as they are undetectable by traditional Sanger sequencing. Since the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, several research groups have compared depth of coverage (DoC) patterns between samples, an approach that may facilitate effective CNV detection. Most CNV detection tools based on DoC comparisons are designed to work with whole-genome sequencing (WGS) or whole-exome sequencing (WES) data. However, few methods developed to date are designed for custom/commercial targeted NGS (tg-NGS) panels, the assays most commonly used for diagnostic purposes. Moreover, the development and evaluation of these tools is hindered by (i) the scarcity of thoroughly annotated data containing CNVs and (ii) a dearth of simulation tools for WES and tg-NGS that mimic the errors and biases encountered in these data. Here, we review DoC-based CNV detection methods described in the current literature, assess their performance with simulated tg-NGS data, and discuss their strengths and weaknesses when integrated into the daily laboratory workflow. Our findings suggest that the best methods for CNV detection in tg-NGS panels are DECoN, ExomeDepth, and ExomeCNV. Regardless of the method used, there is a need to make these programs more user-friendly to enable their use by diagnostic laboratory staff who lack bioinformatics training.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI