倾向得分匹配
观察研究
医学
协变量
匹配(统计)
逆概率加权
加权
选择偏差
随机对照试验
优势和劣势
计量经济学
统计
内科学
数学
病理
心理学
社会心理学
放射科
作者
Saswata Deb,Peter C. Austin,Jack V. Tu,Dennis T. Ko,C. David Mazer,Alex Kiss,Stephen E. Fremes
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cjca.2015.05.015
摘要
Observational studies using propensity-score methods have been increasing in the cardiovascular literature because randomized controlled trials are not always feasible or ethical. However, propensity-score methods can be confusing, and the general audience may not fully understand the importance of this technique. The objectives of this review are to describe (1) the fundamentals of propensity score methods, (2) the techniques to assess for propensity-score model adequacy, (3) the 4 major methods for using the propensity score (matching, stratification, covariate adjustment, and inverse probability of treatment weighting [IPTW]) using examples from previously published cardiovascular studies, and (4) the strengths and weaknesses of these 4 techniques. Our review suggests that matching or IPTW using the propensity score have shown to be most effective in reducing bias of the treatment effect.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI