A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Compare Conventional Drug Instillation to A Device Dropper Method in Medical Treatment of Glaucoma

Purpose To compare and analyze the performance of a device dropper (DD) over conventional drop instillation (CDI) method on ease of administration, compliance, patient satisfaction, and intraocular pressure (IOP) control in persons with glaucoma on ocular hypotensive medications.Methods We enrolled 72 individuals with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, on treatment with fixed combination (α agonist+β blocker) drugs for at least 6 months. These were randomized into two groups (36 in each arm). Group 1 administered the drug with a DD and Group 2 used CDI method. Recruited individuals were interviewed for subjective difficulties using a formatted questionnaire at first month follow-up and IOP change from baseline was evaluated.Results Baseline demographic and ocular characteristics were similar in both groups. 57.1% in the conventional instillation and none in the DD had reported difficulty in using the eye drops on follow-up visit. DD group had significantly less spillage and contamination of eye surface or dropper tips, required minimal assistance, accurately targeted on first drop placement directly into the eye compared to CDI group (p-value<0.001). Mean IOP was comparable between the two groups.Conclusion DD instillation method was observed to be easier to administer, more accurate in targeting the conjunctival cul-de-sac, reduced wastage with lesser contamination compared to the CDI technique. DDs may be expected to have better compliance and effectiveness in medical management of glaucoma.