城市固体废物
生命周期评估
厌氧消化
废物管理
环境影响评价
热解
循环经济
环境科学
环境友好型
工程类
化学
生物
生产(经济)
生态学
经济
甲烷
宏观经济学
有机化学
作者
Junqi Wang,Solomon Inalegwu Okopi,Haoxiang Ma,Miao Wang,Rui Chen,Wangyang Tian,Fuqing Xu
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125486
摘要
The integration of anaerobic digestion (AD) and pyrolysis (Py) could be a solution to economically utilize the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). However, it is not clear whether the environmental impact of the integrated pathway always outperforms the two single technologies. In this study, two integrated pathways (AD-Py, Py-AD) were compared with single AD and Py from the life cycle environmental impacts point of view. The results indicate that the environmental impacts of the four pathways are heavily dependent on their energy inputs and outputs. AD-Py is more environmentally friendly (-11.53 of total environmental impact /kg OFMSW) than single AD or Py. Py-AD exhibites the heaviest environmental burden (2.75 of total environmental impact /kg OFMSW) in all pathways. Therefore, AD-Py can be the top priority of treating OFMSW among the four pathways from the environmental viewpoint. This work could provide a theoretical support for the utilization of OFMSW.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI