亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria as a nutrition assessment tool for patients with cancer

营养不良 医学 接收机工作特性 内科学 癌症 队列 阶段(地层学) 比例危险模型 一致性(知识库) 多元分析 胃肠病学 肿瘤科 数学 几何学 生物 古生物学
作者
Kang‐Ping Zhang,Meng Tang,Zhenming Fu,Qi Zhang,Xi Zhang,Zengqing Guo,Hongxia Xu,Chunhua Song,Marco Braga,Tommy Cederholm,Wei Li,Rocco Barazzoni,Hanping Shi
出处
期刊:Nutrition [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:91-92: 111379-111379 被引量:24
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2021.111379
摘要

Since the launch of Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM), there has been an urgent need to validate the new criteria, especially in patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate and validate the use of the GLIM criteria in patients with cancer.This multicenter cohort study compared the GLIM with the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (sPG-SGA). The 1-y survival rate, multivariate Cox regression analysis, κ-value, sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and time-dependent ROC analysis were applied to identify the performance of the GLIM.Among the 3777 patients in the study, 50.9% versus 49.1% or 36.3% versus 63.7% of the patients were defined as well-nourished and malnourished by GLIM or sPG-SGA, respectively. GLIM presented moderate consistency (κ = 0.54, P < 0.001), fair sensitivity and specificity (70.5 and 88.3%) compared with sPG-SGA. There was no difference in the 1-y survival rate in malnourished patients (76.9 versus 76.4%, P = 0.711), but it was significantly different in well-nourished patients (85.8 versus 90.3%, P < 0.001) between GLIM and sPG-SGA. The above difference was eliminated after omitted nutritional risk screening (NRS)-2002 screening before GLIM (88.1 versus 90.3%, P = 0.078). Omitting NRS-2002 screening before GLIM did not change the 1-y survival rate in well-nourished or malnourished patients by GLIM with NRS-2002 screening (76.9 versus 78.9%, P = 0.099; 85.8% versus 88.1%, P = 0.092) although it significantly raised the rate of malnutrition to 72.5%. The combination of "weight loss and cancer" showed better performance than other combinations.GLIM could be a convenient alternative to sPG-SGA in nutrition assessment for patients with cancer. The combination of "weight loss and cancer" was better than other combinations. Considering the higher risk for malnutrition in patients with cancer, NRS-2002 screening may not be needed before GLIM.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
TearMarks发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
4秒前
5秒前
李爱国应助天真的大白菜采纳,获得10
5秒前
WUHUIWEN完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
Vision820完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
zzq发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
充电宝应助摆渡人采纳,获得10
14秒前
千纸鹤完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
烟花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
Kongstrue完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
研友_LaOyQZ完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
32秒前
蔚欢完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
andrele发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
36秒前
37秒前
丘比特应助优美一曲采纳,获得10
41秒前
Kongstrue发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
哈哈哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
YOLO完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
andrele发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
李末完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
优美一曲发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
kdjm688发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
李健应助lf采纳,获得10
1分钟前
kdjm688发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
优美一曲完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
israr完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
lf发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 700
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3976608
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3520720
关于积分的说明 11204567
捐赠科研通 3257359
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1798716
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 877897
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 806613