Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria as a nutrition assessment tool for patients with cancer

营养不良 医学 接收机工作特性 内科学 癌症 队列 阶段(地层学) 比例危险模型 一致性(知识库) 多元分析 胃肠病学 肿瘤科 数学 几何学 生物 古生物学
作者
Kang‐Ping Zhang,Meng Tang,Zhenming Fu,Qi Zhang,Xi Zhang,Zengqing Guo,Hongxia Xu,Chunhua Song,Marco Braga,Tommy Cederholm,Wei Li,Rocco Barazzoni,Hanping Shi
出处
期刊:Nutrition [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:91-92: 111379-111379 被引量:24
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2021.111379
摘要

Since the launch of Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM), there has been an urgent need to validate the new criteria, especially in patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate and validate the use of the GLIM criteria in patients with cancer.This multicenter cohort study compared the GLIM with the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (sPG-SGA). The 1-y survival rate, multivariate Cox regression analysis, κ-value, sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and time-dependent ROC analysis were applied to identify the performance of the GLIM.Among the 3777 patients in the study, 50.9% versus 49.1% or 36.3% versus 63.7% of the patients were defined as well-nourished and malnourished by GLIM or sPG-SGA, respectively. GLIM presented moderate consistency (κ = 0.54, P < 0.001), fair sensitivity and specificity (70.5 and 88.3%) compared with sPG-SGA. There was no difference in the 1-y survival rate in malnourished patients (76.9 versus 76.4%, P = 0.711), but it was significantly different in well-nourished patients (85.8 versus 90.3%, P < 0.001) between GLIM and sPG-SGA. The above difference was eliminated after omitted nutritional risk screening (NRS)-2002 screening before GLIM (88.1 versus 90.3%, P = 0.078). Omitting NRS-2002 screening before GLIM did not change the 1-y survival rate in well-nourished or malnourished patients by GLIM with NRS-2002 screening (76.9 versus 78.9%, P = 0.099; 85.8% versus 88.1%, P = 0.092) although it significantly raised the rate of malnutrition to 72.5%. The combination of "weight loss and cancer" showed better performance than other combinations.GLIM could be a convenient alternative to sPG-SGA in nutrition assessment for patients with cancer. The combination of "weight loss and cancer" was better than other combinations. Considering the higher risk for malnutrition in patients with cancer, NRS-2002 screening may not be needed before GLIM.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
nkmenghan完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
韶邑完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
penzer完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
suwan完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
张瀚文完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
不吃香菜完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
何日完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
明天完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
rrrick完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
XF发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
结实乐曲完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
顺利紫山完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
liaodongjun完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
ma完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
GOW完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
淡淡的忆彤完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
16秒前
songvv发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
六沉完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
爱笑的曼易完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
爆炒菜头完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
壮观的谷冬完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助小王采纳,获得10
18秒前
imuzi完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
tans0008完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
霸气果汁完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
程南完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
JAMA兜里揣发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
蓝桉完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
jiajiajai完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
犹豫曲奇完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
杨佳于发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
科研通AI5应助Z_yiming采纳,获得10
22秒前
23秒前
Verdant_Official完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038303
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3576013
关于积分的说明 11374210
捐赠科研通 3305780
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819322
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892672
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815029