Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria as a nutrition assessment tool for patients with cancer

营养不良 医学 接收机工作特性 内科学 癌症 队列 阶段(地层学) 比例危险模型 一致性(知识库) 多元分析 胃肠病学 肿瘤科 数学 几何学 生物 古生物学
作者
Kang‐Ping Zhang,Meng Tang,Zhenming Fu,Qi Zhang,Xi Zhang,Zengqing Guo,Hongxia Xu,Chunhua Song,Marco Braga,Tommy Cederholm,Wei Li,Rocco Barazzoni,Hanping Shi
出处
期刊:Nutrition [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:91-92: 111379-111379 被引量:24
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2021.111379
摘要

Since the launch of Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM), there has been an urgent need to validate the new criteria, especially in patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate and validate the use of the GLIM criteria in patients with cancer.This multicenter cohort study compared the GLIM with the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (sPG-SGA). The 1-y survival rate, multivariate Cox regression analysis, κ-value, sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and time-dependent ROC analysis were applied to identify the performance of the GLIM.Among the 3777 patients in the study, 50.9% versus 49.1% or 36.3% versus 63.7% of the patients were defined as well-nourished and malnourished by GLIM or sPG-SGA, respectively. GLIM presented moderate consistency (κ = 0.54, P < 0.001), fair sensitivity and specificity (70.5 and 88.3%) compared with sPG-SGA. There was no difference in the 1-y survival rate in malnourished patients (76.9 versus 76.4%, P = 0.711), but it was significantly different in well-nourished patients (85.8 versus 90.3%, P < 0.001) between GLIM and sPG-SGA. The above difference was eliminated after omitted nutritional risk screening (NRS)-2002 screening before GLIM (88.1 versus 90.3%, P = 0.078). Omitting NRS-2002 screening before GLIM did not change the 1-y survival rate in well-nourished or malnourished patients by GLIM with NRS-2002 screening (76.9 versus 78.9%, P = 0.099; 85.8% versus 88.1%, P = 0.092) although it significantly raised the rate of malnutrition to 72.5%. The combination of "weight loss and cancer" showed better performance than other combinations.GLIM could be a convenient alternative to sPG-SGA in nutrition assessment for patients with cancer. The combination of "weight loss and cancer" was better than other combinations. Considering the higher risk for malnutrition in patients with cancer, NRS-2002 screening may not be needed before GLIM.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
月光奏鸣曲完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
SYLH应助强健的蚂蚁采纳,获得10
刚刚
完美世界应助double_x采纳,获得10
刚刚
彭于晏应助dou采纳,获得10
刚刚
哈哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
单耳元完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
苏芳完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
超帅谷芹发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
luojimao发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
wst发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
科研通AI2S应助Newky采纳,获得10
3秒前
欧皇降霖发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
PJT-8450完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Ellen完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
香蕉觅云应助坚果采纳,获得10
4秒前
无花果应助矫仁瑞采纳,获得10
4秒前
liangxiuting完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
爆米花应助动生电动势采纳,获得10
4秒前
Zhengyiwu发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
zhao完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
柚子发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
于雪雯发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
lqllll发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
斯文败类应助忧心的不二采纳,获得10
6秒前
殷勤的觅松完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
华仔应助黑煤球采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
纯真的莫茗完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
Jasper应助chenchen采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
眯眯眼的枕头完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3970572
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3515219
关于积分的说明 11177438
捐赠科研通 3250374
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1795265
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 875750
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 805054