Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria as a nutrition assessment tool for patients with cancer

营养不良 医学 接收机工作特性 内科学 癌症 队列 阶段(地层学) 比例危险模型 一致性(知识库) 多元分析 胃肠病学 肿瘤科 数学 几何学 生物 古生物学
作者
Kang‐Ping Zhang,Meng Tang,Zhenming Fu,Qi Zhang,Xi Zhang,Zengqing Guo,Hongxia Xu,Chunhua Song,Marco Braga,Tommy Cederholm,Wei Li,Rocco Barazzoni,Hanping Shi
出处
期刊:Nutrition [Elsevier]
卷期号:91-92: 111379-111379 被引量:24
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2021.111379
摘要

Since the launch of Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM), there has been an urgent need to validate the new criteria, especially in patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate and validate the use of the GLIM criteria in patients with cancer.This multicenter cohort study compared the GLIM with the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (sPG-SGA). The 1-y survival rate, multivariate Cox regression analysis, κ-value, sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and time-dependent ROC analysis were applied to identify the performance of the GLIM.Among the 3777 patients in the study, 50.9% versus 49.1% or 36.3% versus 63.7% of the patients were defined as well-nourished and malnourished by GLIM or sPG-SGA, respectively. GLIM presented moderate consistency (κ = 0.54, P < 0.001), fair sensitivity and specificity (70.5 and 88.3%) compared with sPG-SGA. There was no difference in the 1-y survival rate in malnourished patients (76.9 versus 76.4%, P = 0.711), but it was significantly different in well-nourished patients (85.8 versus 90.3%, P < 0.001) between GLIM and sPG-SGA. The above difference was eliminated after omitted nutritional risk screening (NRS)-2002 screening before GLIM (88.1 versus 90.3%, P = 0.078). Omitting NRS-2002 screening before GLIM did not change the 1-y survival rate in well-nourished or malnourished patients by GLIM with NRS-2002 screening (76.9 versus 78.9%, P = 0.099; 85.8% versus 88.1%, P = 0.092) although it significantly raised the rate of malnutrition to 72.5%. The combination of "weight loss and cancer" showed better performance than other combinations.GLIM could be a convenient alternative to sPG-SGA in nutrition assessment for patients with cancer. The combination of "weight loss and cancer" was better than other combinations. Considering the higher risk for malnutrition in patients with cancer, NRS-2002 screening may not be needed before GLIM.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
冷静芹菜完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
4秒前
科研小废物完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
6秒前
6秒前
Zr完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
干净的向真完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
10秒前
yif完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
Imperry发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
MXene完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
龙龙发布了新的文献求助20
13秒前
kenna123发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Disci发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
上官发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
Ava应助寒冷的天亦采纳,获得10
18秒前
Min完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
大模型应助Imperry采纳,获得10
20秒前
卡农发布了新的文献求助50
20秒前
kenna123完成签到,获得积分20
23秒前
24秒前
CLubiy完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
852应助白衣采纳,获得10
32秒前
花椒鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
taoeric发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
姚子敏完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
所所应助Alice采纳,获得10
36秒前
38秒前
Mycee完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
41秒前
初初遇你发布了新的文献求助10
44秒前
鱼头完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
高分求助中
The ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication 2500
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Studien zur Ideengeschichte der Gesetzgebung 1000
TM 5-855-1(Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons) 1000
Threaded Harmony: A Sustainable Approach to Fashion 810
Pharmacogenomics: Applications to Patient Care, Third Edition 800
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3082501
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2735655
关于积分的说明 7538441
捐赠科研通 2385263
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1264761
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 612786
版权声明 597665