Pharmacological Basis of Differences in Dose Response, Dose Equivalence, and Duration of Action of Inhaled Corticosteroids

医学 丙酸氟替卡松 养生 药效学 药代动力学 起效 皮质类固醇 药理学 氟替卡松 治疗指标 内科学 药品
作者
Peter T. Daley‐Yates,Bhumika Aggarwal,Maximilian Plank
出处
期刊:Advances in Therapy [Springer Nature]
卷期号:41 (5): 1995-2009 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1007/s12325-024-02823-y
摘要

Asthma treatment guidelines classify inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) regimens as low, medium, or high dose. However, efficacy and safety are not independently assessed accordingly. Moreover, differences in ICS duration of action are not considered when a dose regimen is selected. We investigated the efficacy and safety implications of these limitations for available ICS molecules. Published pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters were used, alongside physiological and pharmacological principles, to estimate the efficacy and safety of available ICS molecules. Extent and duration of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) occupancy in the lung (efficacy) and cortisol suppression (systemic exposure and safety) were estimated. Some ICS regimens (e.g., fluticasone furoate, fluticasone propionate, and ciclesonide) rank high for efficacy but low for systemic exposure, contrary to how ICS dose equivalence is currently viewed. Differences in dose–response relationships for efficacy and systemic exposure were unique for each ICS regimen and reflected in their therapeutic indices. Notably, even low doses of most ICSs can generate high GR occupancy (≥ 90%) across the entire dose interval at steady state, which may explain previously reported difficulties in obtaining dose responses within the clinical dose range and observations that most clinical benefit typically occurs at low doses. The estimated post dose duration of lung GR occupancy for ICS molecules was categorized as 4–6 h (short), 14–16 h (medium), 25–40 h (long), or > 80 h (ultra-long), suggesting potentially large differences in anti-inflammatory duration of action. In a real-world clinical setting where there may be poor adherence to prescribed therapy, our findings suggest a significant therapeutic advantage for longer-acting ICS molecules in patients with asthma. Patients with asthma often rely on inhaled corticosteroids to manage their symptoms by controlling lung inflammation. Inhaled corticosteroids can be used at low, medium, or high doses; however, the effectiveness, safety, and how long the effects last for a particular inhaled corticosteroid molecule are not considered when choosing them. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of different inhaled corticosteroid molecules. Leveraging published data on the mode of anti-inflammatory action and the rates these molecules are absorbed and eliminated from the body, we estimated their effectiveness and safety profiles, including duration of action in the lungs and systemic exposure levels. Some inhaled corticosteroid molecules such as fluticasone furoate, fluticasone propionate, and ciclesonide were found to exhibit high anti-inflammatory effectiveness in the lungs with minimal systemic exposure, contrasting the perceived similarities among currently used drug molecules. Anti-inflammatory duration of the unwanted systemic effect in the rest of the body was unique for each inhaled corticosteroid molecule. Notably, even the lowest doses of most inhaled corticosteroids were found to be effective in the lungs when taken as prescribed, supporting previous observations that clinical benefits are mostly realized at lower doses. Furthermore, estimated post dose durations of effectiveness for different inhaled corticosteroid molecules varied widely among different molecules, with some lasting a few hours and others lasting more than 80 h, suggesting significant differences in their duration of action. Overall, these findings demonstrate the potential advantage of using longer-acting inhaled corticosteroids, particularly for patients with asthma who may face challenges in adhering to prescribed regimens.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
丘比特应助Naturewoman采纳,获得10
刚刚
震震发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
简单的莫言完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
小陈发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
gyh应助hsa_ID采纳,获得10
2秒前
love迈扣发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
深情安青应助秋博采纳,获得10
2秒前
张琪发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Akim应助lingfeng采纳,获得10
4秒前
微笑的依凝完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
mm发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
same发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
随风少年完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
苯醌完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
yzp111发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
Jeri完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
GC发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
biubiu发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
love迈扣完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
李天磊发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
linju发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
SJD完成签到,获得积分0
8秒前
晚睡是小狗应助小小酥采纳,获得10
9秒前
随风少年发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
zlh123发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
mm完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
Bellis完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
豆包完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
yzp111完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
Les_Touls完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
HelenShi发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
隐形路灯发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6024555
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7657137
关于积分的说明 16176703
捐赠科研通 5172947
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2767816
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1751306
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1637515