Quality and Dependability of ChatGPT and DingXiangYuan Forums for Remote Orthopedic Consultations: Comparative Analysis

质量(理念) 病历 控制(管理) 骨科手术 认证 医疗保健 家庭医学 计算机科学 医学 内科学 人工智能 外科 哲学 认识论 政治学 法学 经济 经济增长
作者
Zhaowen Xue,Yiming Zhang,Wenyi Gan,Huajun Wang,Guorong She,Xiaofei Zheng
出处
期刊:Journal of Medical Internet Research [JMIR Publications]
卷期号:26: e50882-e50882 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.2196/50882
摘要

Background The widespread use of artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT (OpenAI), is transforming sectors, including health care, while separate advancements of the internet have enabled platforms such as China’s DingXiangYuan to offer remote medical services. Objective This study evaluates ChatGPT-4’s responses against those of professional health care providers in telemedicine, assessing artificial intelligence’s capability to support the surge in remote medical consultations and its impact on health care delivery. Methods We sourced remote orthopedic consultations from “Doctor DingXiang,” with responses from its certified physicians as the control and ChatGPT’s responses as the experimental group. In all, 3 blindfolded, experienced orthopedic surgeons assessed responses against 7 criteria: “logical reasoning,” “internal information,” “external information,” “guiding function,” “therapeutic effect,” “medical knowledge popularization education,” and “overall satisfaction.” We used Fleiss κ to measure agreement among multiple raters. Results Initially, consultation records for a cumulative count of 8 maladies (equivalent to 800 cases) were gathered. We ultimately included 73 consultation records by May 2023, following primary and rescreening, in which no communication records containing private information, images, or voice messages were transmitted. After statistical scoring, we discovered that ChatGPT’s “internal information” score (mean 4.61, SD 0.52 points vs mean 4.66, SD 0.49 points; P=.43) and “therapeutic effect” score (mean 4.43, SD 0.75 points vs mean 4.55, SD 0.62 points; P=.32) were lower than those of the control group, but the differences were not statistically significant. ChatGPT showed better performance with a higher “logical reasoning” score (mean 4.81, SD 0.36 points vs mean 4.75, SD 0.39 points; P=.38), “external information” score (mean 4.06, SD 0.72 points vs mean 3.92, SD 0.77 points; P=.25), and “guiding function” score (mean 4.73, SD 0.51 points vs mean 4.72, SD 0.54 points; P=.96), although the differences were not statistically significant. Meanwhile, the “medical knowledge popularization education” score of ChatGPT was better than that of the control group (mean 4.49, SD 0.67 points vs mean 3.87, SD 1.01 points; P<.001), and the difference was statistically significant. In terms of “overall satisfaction,” the difference was not statistically significant between the groups (mean 8.35, SD 1.38 points vs mean 8.37, SD 1.24 points; P=.92). According to how Fleiss κ values were interpreted, 6 of the control group’s score points were classified as displaying “fair agreement” (P<.001), and 1 was classified as showing “substantial agreement” (P<.001). In the experimental group, 3 points were classified as indicating “fair agreement,” while 4 suggested “moderate agreement” (P<.001). Conclusions ChatGPT-4 matches the expertise found in DingXiangYuan forums’ paid consultations, excelling particularly in scientific education. It presents a promising alternative for remote health advice. For health care professionals, it could act as an aid in patient education, while patients may use it as a convenient tool for health inquiries.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
垃圾桶发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
CodeCraft应助poppy采纳,获得10
1秒前
捕猎者hhr发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
浅尝离白完成签到,获得积分0
3秒前
3秒前
JamesPei应助小Q啊啾采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
hjp发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Li发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
丁昆完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
chong0919完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
hiyuz发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
yyljc完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
情怀应助大力的诗蕾采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
SciGPT应助PRIPRO采纳,获得10
11秒前
lonelymusic完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
眼睛大雨筠应助帅气男孩采纳,获得30
11秒前
radio完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
智慧女孩发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
完美世界应助风息采纳,获得10
13秒前
16秒前
16秒前
026发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
yu完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
精气被实验吸干完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
上官若男应助iui飞采纳,获得10
19秒前
生动汲完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
mmyhn应助啵清啵采纳,获得20
21秒前
21秒前
21秒前
22秒前
机智的砖家完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
24秒前
hi应助Betty采纳,获得10
24秒前
大风车完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
Toward a Combinatorial Approach for the Prediction of IgG Half-Life and Clearance 500
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3969917
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3514626
关于积分的说明 11175060
捐赠科研通 3249928
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1795165
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 875617
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 804891