亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Comparative Effect of Loop Diuretic Prescription on Mortality and Heart Failure Readmission

布美他尼 速尿 医学 利尿剂 利尿剂 心力衰竭 危险系数 内科学 置信区间 药方 心脏病学 药理学 有机化学 化学 协同运输机
作者
Arti Virkud,Patricia P. Chang,Michele Jönsson Funk,Abhijit V. Kshirsagar,Jessie K. Edwards,Virginia Pate,Michael R. Kosorok,Emily W. Gower
出处
期刊:American Journal of Cardiology [Elsevier]
卷期号:210: 208-216 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.162
摘要

Loop diuretics are a standard pharmacologic therapy in heart failure (HF) management. Although furosemide is most frequently used, torsemide and bumetanide are increasingly prescribed in clinical practice, possibly because of superior bioavailability. Few real-world comparative effectiveness studies have examined outcomes across all 3 loop diuretics. The study goal was to compare the effects of loop diuretic prescribing at HF hospitalization discharge on mortality and HF readmission. We identified patients in Medicare claims data initiating furosemide, torsemide, or bumetanide after an index HF hospitalization from 2007 to 2017. We estimated 6-month risks of all-cause mortality and a composite outcome (HF readmission or all-cause mortality) using inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for relevant confounders. We identified 62,632 furosemide, 1,720 torsemide, and 2,389 bumetanide initiators. The 6-month adjusted all-cause mortality risk was lowest for torsemide (13.2%), followed by furosemide (14.5%) and bumetanide (15.6%). The 6-month composite outcome risk was 21.4% for torsemide, 24.7% for furosemide, and 24.9% for bumetanide. Compared with furosemide, the 6-month all-cause mortality risk was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: −3.7, 1.0) lower for torsemide and 1.0% (95% CI: −1.2, 3.2) higher for bumetanide, and the 6-month composite outcome risk was 3.3% (95% CI: −6.3, −0.3) lower for torsemide and 0.2% (95% CI: −2.5, 2.9) higher for bumetanide. In conclusion, the findings suggested that the first prescribed loop diuretic following HF hospitalization is associated with clinically important differences in morbidity in older patients receiving torsemide, bumetanide, or furosemide. These differences were consistent for the effect of all-cause mortality alone, but were not statistically significant. Loop diuretics are a standard pharmacologic therapy in heart failure (HF) management. Although furosemide is most frequently used, torsemide and bumetanide are increasingly prescribed in clinical practice, possibly because of superior bioavailability. Few real-world comparative effectiveness studies have examined outcomes across all 3 loop diuretics. The study goal was to compare the effects of loop diuretic prescribing at HF hospitalization discharge on mortality and HF readmission. We identified patients in Medicare claims data initiating furosemide, torsemide, or bumetanide after an index HF hospitalization from 2007 to 2017. We estimated 6-month risks of all-cause mortality and a composite outcome (HF readmission or all-cause mortality) using inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for relevant confounders. We identified 62,632 furosemide, 1,720 torsemide, and 2,389 bumetanide initiators. The 6-month adjusted all-cause mortality risk was lowest for torsemide (13.2%), followed by furosemide (14.5%) and bumetanide (15.6%). The 6-month composite outcome risk was 21.4% for torsemide, 24.7% for furosemide, and 24.9% for bumetanide. Compared with furosemide, the 6-month all-cause mortality risk was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: −3.7, 1.0) lower for torsemide and 1.0% (95% CI: −1.2, 3.2) higher for bumetanide, and the 6-month composite outcome risk was 3.3% (95% CI: −6.3, −0.3) lower for torsemide and 0.2% (95% CI: −2.5, 2.9) higher for bumetanide. In conclusion, the findings suggested that the first prescribed loop diuretic following HF hospitalization is associated with clinically important differences in morbidity in older patients receiving torsemide, bumetanide, or furosemide. These differences were consistent for the effect of all-cause mortality alone, but were not statistically significant. Garnering Insight from Claims-Based Databases on the Association between Loop Diuretics and Heart Failure OutcomesAmerican Journal of CardiologyVol. 210PreviewIn this month's issue of the American Journal of Cardiology, a study by Virkud et al1 reported on the association among 3 different loop diuretics (furosemide, torsemide, and bumetadine) initiated as an outpatient after an index hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of heart failure (HF) and the outcomes of HF readmission and all-cause mortality in Medicare beneficiaries. The authors noted a difference in the association between loop diuretics and all-cause mortality and composite outcome including both HF readmission and all-cause mortality. Full-Text PDF

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
7秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
32秒前
Andy应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
32秒前
周娅敏完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
Akim应助twk采纳,获得10
39秒前
狂野的含烟完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
liuliu完成签到,获得积分10
52秒前
janrk完成签到,获得积分10
59秒前
HYQ完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
彭于晏应助可爱的小杨采纳,获得10
1分钟前
smilence完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
魔幻友菱完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
机智灵薇完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
阿言完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
Ricardo发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
随便起个名完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
Ricardo完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
fdwonder发布了新的文献求助30
3分钟前
jarrykim完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
无与伦比完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
脑洞疼应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
紫焰完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
6分钟前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6分钟前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6分钟前
静坐听雨萧完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
dzhang198777发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
CC发布了新的文献求助20
6分钟前
6分钟前
twk发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
dzhang198777完成签到,获得积分20
7分钟前
星辰大海应助twk采纳,获得10
7分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 9th Edition 500
Social Work and Social Welfare: An Invitation(7th Edition) 410
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6051040
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7853556
关于积分的说明 16267130
捐赠科研通 5196128
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2780489
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1763403
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1645422