Computed Tomography Imaging Patterns of Sinonasal Inverted Papillomas: Comparison of Primary and Recurrent Disease

Objective To analyze clinical and radiographic features that may impact the rate of focal hyperostosis (FH) on computed tomography (CT) for primary and recurrent sinonasal inverted papillomas (IPs) as well as highlight factors that may affect concordance between FH and IP true attachment point (TAP). Methods All IPs resected between 2006 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. CTs were read by a neuroradiologist blinded to operative details. IP with malignancy was excluded. Operative reports and long‐term follow‐up data were evaluated. Results Of 92 IPs, 60.1% had FH, 25% had no CT bony changes, and 20.7% were revision cases. The recurrence rate for rhinologists was 10.5% overall and 7.3% for primary IPs. Primary and revision IPs had a similar rate of FH (63% vs. 52.6%; p = 0.646) and FH–TAP agreement (71.7% vs. 90%; p = 0.664). Nasal cavity IPs, especially with septal attachment, were more likely to lack bony changes on CT (57.1%) compared to other subsites ( p = 0.018). Recurrent tumors were 16 mm larger on average (55 mm vs. 39 mm; p = 0.008). FH (75.0% vs. 60.9%; p = 0.295), FH–TAP concordance (91.7% vs. 74.4%; p = 0.094), and secondary IP (18.8% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.889) rates were similar between recurrent and nonrecurrent tumors. Conclusion Primary and revision IPs have a similar rate of FH and FH–TAP agreement. Nasal cavity IPs are less likely to exhibit bony CT changes. Lower recurrence was associated with smaller size and fellowship training but not multiple TAPs, revision, FH absence, or FH–TAP discordance. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope , 134:1591–1596, 2024