解算器
运动规划
计算机科学
能源消耗
数学优化
启发式
路径(计算)
灵活性(工程)
设置覆盖问题
模拟退火
能量(信号处理)
高效能源利用
实时计算
模拟
集合(抽象数据类型)
算法
人工智能
机器人
工程类
数学
统计
电气工程
程序设计语言
作者
Gamil Ahmed,Tarek Sheltami,Ashraf Mahmoud,Ansar-Ul-Haque Yasar
出处
期刊:Cmes-computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences
[Computers, Materials and Continua (Tech Science Press)]
日期:2023-01-01
卷期号:136 (3): 3239-3263
被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.32604/cmes.2023.022860
摘要
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones, have drawn significant consideration thanks to their agility, mobility, and flexibility features. They play a crucial role in modern reconnaissance, inspection, intelligence, and surveillance missions. Coverage path planning (CPP) which is one of the crucial aspects that determines an intelligent system's quality seeks an optimal trajectory to fully cover the region of interest (ROI). However, the flight time of the UAV is limited due to a battery limitation and may not cover the whole region, especially in large region. Therefore, energy consumption is one of the most challenging issues that need to be optimized. In this paper, we propose an energy-efficient coverage path planning algorithm to solve the CPP problem. The objective is to generate a collision-free coverage path that minimizes the overall energy consumption and guarantees covering the whole region. To do so, the flight path is optimized and the number of turns is reduced to minimize the energy consumption. The proposed approach first decomposes the ROI into a set of cells depending on a UAV camera footprint. Then, the coverage path planning problem is formulated, where the exact solution is determined using the CPLEX solver. For small-scale problems, the CPLEX shows a better solution in a reasonable time. However, the CPLEX solver fails to generate the solution within a reasonable time for large-scale problems. Thus, to solve the model for large-scale problems, simulated annealing for CPP is developed. The results show that heuristic approaches yield a better solution for large-scale problems within a much shorter execution time than the CPLEX solver. Finally, we compare the simulated annealing against the greedy algorithm. The results show that simulated annealing outperforms the greedy algorithm in generating better solution quality.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI