Cervical cerclage for short cervix at 24 to 26 weeks of gestation: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data

荟萃分析 宫颈环扎术 医学 随机对照试验 妊娠期 子宫颈 产科 妇科 怀孕 外科 内科学 癌症 生物 遗传学
作者
Moti Gulersen,Erez Lenchner,K. H. Nicolaides,Katsufumi Otsuki,Orion A. Rust,Sietske Althuisius,Eran Bornstein,Vincenzo Berghella
出处
期刊:American Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:5 (6): 100930-100930 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100930
摘要

This study aimed to determine whether cervical cerclage for a transvaginal ultrasound-detected short cervical length after 24 weeks of gestation in singleton pregnancies reduces the risk for preterm birth.Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using the following terms: "cerclage, cervical," "uterine cervical incompetence," "obstetrical surgical procedures," "cervix uteri," "randomized controlled trial," and "controlled clinical trial."All randomized controlled trials comparing cerclage placement with no cerclage in singleton gestations with a transvaginal ultrasound-detected short cervical length ≤25 mm between 24+0/7 and 29+6/7 weeks of gestation were eligible for inclusion.Individual patient-level data from each trial were collected. If an eligible trial included patients with both multiple and singleton gestations with a short cervical length detected either before or after 24+0/7 weeks of gestation, only singletons who presented at or after 24+0/7 weeks were included. The primary outcome was preterm birth <37 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes included preterm birth <34, <32, and <28 weeks' gestation, gestational age at delivery, latency, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, and adverse neonatal outcomes. Individual patient-level data from each trial were analyzed using a 2-stage approach. Pooled relative risks or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated as appropriate.Data from the 4 eligible randomized controlled trials were included. A total of 131 singletons presented at 24+0/7 to 26+6/7 weeks of gestation and were further analyzed; there were no data on patients with a cerclage at 27+0/7 weeks' gestation or later. Of those included, 66 (50.4%) were in the cerclage group and 65 (49.6%) were in the no cerclage group. The rate of preterm birth <37 weeks' gestation was similar between patients who were randomized to the cerclage group and those who were randomized to the no cerclage group (27.3% vs 38.5%; relative risk, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.28). Secondary outcomes including preterm birth <34, <32, and <28 weeks' gestation, gestational age at delivery, time interval from randomization to delivery, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, and adverse neonatal outcomes such as low birthweight, very low birthweight, and perinatal death were similar between the 2 groups. Planned subgroup analyses revealed no statistically significant differences in the rate of preterm birth <37 weeks' gestation between the 2 groups when compared based on cervical length measurement (≤15 mm or ≤10 mm), gestational age at randomization (24+0/7 to 24+6/7 weeks or 25+0/7 to 26+6/7 weeks), or history of preterm birth.Cervical cerclage did not reduce or increase the rate of preterm birth among singleton pregnancies with a short cervical length detected after 24 weeks of gestation. Because there was a 22% nonsignificant decrease in preterm birth associated with cerclage, which is a similar amount of risk reduction often associated with ultrasound-indicated cerclage before 24 weeks' gestation, further randomized controlled trials in this patient population are warranted.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
科研通AI2S应助呆萌的雪碧采纳,获得10
1秒前
Archy完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
852应助Estella采纳,获得10
1秒前
newnew发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
cdddddy发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
啊呜发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
科研通AI5应助1531811采纳,获得30
3秒前
冷傲书萱发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
Akim应助FF采纳,获得10
3秒前
丘比特应助LLLLLL采纳,获得10
3秒前
鲤鱼如容发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
aifeeling发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
大喜发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
连糜发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
BioRick发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
科研通AI5应助donsa采纳,获得10
5秒前
zee完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
顾文杰完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
邓晓霞完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
奋斗梦旋发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
weiwei完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
连糜完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Dr.Lawrence应助虚拟的怀绿采纳,获得10
10秒前
1531811完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
yy关注了科研通微信公众号
11秒前
12秒前
七柚完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
RingCake发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
admin完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
Distinct Aggregation Behaviors and Rheological Responses of Two Terminally Functionalized Polyisoprenes with Different Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding Motifs 450
Ciprofol versus propofol for adult sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3669446
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3227157
关于积分的说明 9773662
捐赠科研通 2937177
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1609199
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 760130
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 735760