Impact of Pretension and Cycling Window on Degradation of Graphite/Silicon Composite Anodes

Challenges such as mechanical degradation and limited cycle life persist for high energy density lithium-ion batteries with silicon/graphite composite anodes. In this research work, the patterns of degradation of cells with silicon/graphite composite and NMC622 cathode are examined at varied cycling conditions and applied external pressure or pretension. The most notable outcome of this analysis is that cells cycled between 0 and 100 State-of-Charge (SoC) exhibit the most accelerated aging process. Increasing the pretension force effectively restrains the irreversible expansion of the cells, and has a positive effect on capacity retention. In this research, a comprehensive experiment was conducted involving 46 cells subjected to diverse cycling conditions, voltage windows, pretension forces, and temperatures. Reference performance tests (e.g. HPPC and 1/20 C-rate charge tests) are conducted regularly for analysis of degradation mechanisms. The capacity fade, resistance growth, and thickness increase are correspondingly shown in Figures 1, 2, and 3 with ampere hour throughput as the x-axis. The legend columns indicate test conditions, including C-rate, SoC window during cycling, temperature (in degrees Celsius), and pretension force (in psi). As is shown in all figures, there is a substantial dependence on the SoC window for cycling. To be specific, a rapid rate of capacity loss, resistance increase, and thickness increase occurs in the cell group cycled over the full SoC window (plotted in blue). Cells cycled under full SoC windows also exhibit an early accelerated fading (knee [1]) of capacity and accelerated increase (elbows [2]) of resistance and thickness. According to [3], this accelerated aging could be a consequence of side reactions and increased mechanical stress within the silicon particle when operating across a broad potential range. Meanwhile, for the cell group with restrained cycle windows (plotted in gray) the cells have not yet reached any knee, and have a relatively linear capacity loss. It should be noted that, within the range of partial cycling windows examined, cells subjected to a cycling range of 50-100 exhibit the most rapid degradation, which aligns with the conclusions presented in [4] due to the time at elevated potential. In Figure 2, the elevated temperature (depicted in red) exhibits a significant influence on the increase in resistance, potentially attributed to the growth of the solid electrolyte interface (SEI), but minimal impact on capacity loss. Maintaining other conditions constant and comparing cells under 25 psi and 15 psi (marked with hollow circles and filled circles, respectively), it is evident that a higher pretension force has a positive effect on cell capacity loss. Simultaneously, in Figure 3, the pretension force at 25 psi (marked with hollow circles) effectively restrains the irreversible expansion of the cells. The results are similar to the degradation pattern outlined in [5], it is observed that employing a high pretension force facilitates the mitigation of both degradation and expansion. As highlighted in [6], heightened temperatures lead to accelerated resistance growth. Nevertheless, the impact of various C-rates on degradation remains inconclusive [6]. This research systematically analyzed cell-level degradation through an extensive array of experiments, providing valuable insights into the intricate dynamics of capacity fade, resistance increase, and thickness growth. The study's revelation that the cycle window exerts a pronounced impact on battery health could offer crucial guidance for the design of Battery Management Systems (BMS). Moreover, the work establishes a foundational basis for future research, particularly in exploring electrode-level degradation patterns. These contributions collectively enhance the understanding of energy storage systems, offering practical implications for optimizing battery performance and longevity in various applications. [1]Attia, Peter M., et al. "“Knees” in lithium-ion battery aging trajectories." Journal of The Electrochemical Society 169.6 (2022): 060517. [2] Strange, Calum, et al. "Elbows of internal resistance rise curves in Li-ion cells." Energies 14.4 (2021): 1206. [3] Verbrugge, Mark, et al. "Fabrication and characterization of lithium-silicon thick-film electrodes for high-energy-density batteries." Journal of The Electrochemical Society 164.2 (2016): A156. [4] Xu, Bolun, et al. "Modeling of lithium-ion battery degradation for cell life assessment." IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 9.2 (2016): 1131-1140. [5] Mohtat, Peyman, et al. "Reversible and irreversible expansion of lithium-ion batteries under a wide range of stress factors." Journal of The Electrochemical Society 168.10 (2021): 100520. [6] Pannala, Sravan, et al. "An Experimental Correlation of Degradation with Cell Reversible and Irreversible Expansion Measurement in Pouch Cells." Electrochemical Society Meeting Abstracts 243. No. 2. The Electrochemical Society, Inc., 2023. Figure 1