焚化
生命周期评估
利乐
废物管理
环境经济学
环境影响评价
城市固体废物
业务
经济影响分析
资源(消歧)
净现值
自然资源经济学
环境科学
工程类
生产(经济)
计算机科学
经济
土木工程
生物
宏观经济学
古生物学
计算机网络
生态学
作者
Huijuan Dong,Feng Yang,Zhujie Bi,Chenyi Zhang,Xiao Lei,Yong Geng,Satoshi Ohnishi,Haifeng Li
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107355
摘要
Tetra Pak, a typical low-value waste, is one of the great challenges faced by municipal solid waste management but is rarely investigated. Therefore, this study takes Shanghai, China as a case to evaluate the life cycle environmental impacts and costs of Tetra Pak recycling technologies. The indicator of social cost that integrates life cycle environmental impact and economic cost is innovatively proposed. We found the three recycling technologies all exhibit better environmental performance than incineration. Chemical Separation (technology 2) has the largest environmental mitigation impacts, with climate change and resource consumption mitigation being 2.5 times and 3.8 times that of incineration, respectively. From an economic perspective, plastic-wood technology is the optimal, with a net economic benefit of 2900 RMB/ton Tetra Pak. While from social cost perspective, technology 2 is the best, achieving 6731 RMB/ton benefit. We suggest promoting Tetra Pak recycling technology 2, establishing recycling system, and strengthening end-of-pipe companies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI