医学
外科
穿孔
不利影响
肌切开术
临床疗效
贲门失弛缓症
食管
材料科学
内科学
冲孔
冶金
作者
Andrew Canakis,Sanad Dawod,Enad Dawod,Malorie Simons,Bianca Di Cocco,Donevan Westerveld,Roberto Trasolini,Tyler M. Berzin,Christopher Marshall,Ahmed Abdelfattah,Neil B. Marya,George Smallfield,M. Kaspar,Guilherme M. Campos,Wasseem Skef,Prashant Kedia,Terrence A. Smith,Hiroyuki Aihara,Matthew T. Moyer,Kartik Sampath,SriHari Mahadev,David L. Carr‐Locke,Reem Z. Sharaiha
标识
DOI:10.1097/mcg.0000000000001977
摘要
Background and Aims: The application of endoscopic suturing has revolutionized defect closures. Conventional over-the-scope suturing necessitates removal of the scope, placement of the device, and reinsertion. A single channel, single sequence, through-the-scope suturing device has been developed to improve this process. This study aims to describe the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of a through-the-scope suturing device for gastrointestinal defect closure. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study involving 9 centers of consecutive adult patients who underwent suturing using the X-Tack Endoscopic HeliX Tacking System (Apollo Endosurgery). The primary outcomes were technical success and long-term clinical success. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, recurrence, and reintervention rates. Results: In all, 56 patients (mean age 53.8, 33 women) were included. Suturing indications included fistula repair (n=22), leak repair (n=7), polypectomy defect closure (n=12), peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) site closure (n=7), perforation repair (n=6), and ulcers (n=2). Patients were followed at a mean duration of 74 days. Overall technical and long-term clinical success rates were 92.9% and 75%, respectively. Both technical and clinical success rates were 100% for polypectomies, POEM-site closures, and ulcers. Success rates were lower for the repair of fistulas (95.5% technical, 54.5% clinical), leaks (57.1%, 28.6%), and perforations (100%, 66.7%). No immediate adverse events were noted. Conclusion: This novel, through-the-scope endoscopic suturing system, is a safe and feasible method to repair defects that are ≤3 cm. The efficacy of this device may be better suited for superficial defects as opposed to full-thickness defects. Larger defects will need more sutures and probably a double closure technique to provide a reinforcement layer.