神经心理状态评估的可重复电池
医学
经颅直流电刺激
随机对照试验
重性抑郁障碍
神经认知
评定量表
老人忧郁量表
磁刺激
认知
神经心理学
物理疗法
精神科
内科学
抑郁症状
刺激
心理学
发展心理学
作者
Xingxing Li,Junyao Liu,Shuochi Wei,Chang Yu,Dongmei Wang,Yuchen Li,Jiaxin Li,Weihua Zhuang,Rui‐Chen‐Xi Luo,Yan Li Li,Zhiwang Liu,Yuqiu Su,Jimeng Liu,Yongming Xu,Jialin Fan,Guidong Zhu,Weiqian Xu,Yiping Tang,Hui Yan,Raymond Y. Cho,Thomas R. Kosten,Dongsheng Zhou,Qian Zhang
出处
期刊:BMC Medicine
[Springer Nature]
日期:2024-06-20
卷期号:22 (1)
标识
DOI:10.1186/s12916-024-03443-7
摘要
Abstract Background Cognitive dysfunction is one of the common symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been studied separately in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction in MDD patients. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of rTMS combined with tDCS as a new therapy to improve neurocognitive impairment in MDD patients. Methods In this brief 2-week, double-blind, randomized, and sham-controlled trial, a total of 550 patients were screened, and 240 MDD inpatients were randomized into four groups (active rTMS + active tDCS, active rTMS + sham tDCS, sham rTMS + active tDCS, sham rTMS + sham tDCS). Finally, 203 patients completed the study and received 10 treatment sessions over a 2-week period. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) was performed to assess patients’ cognitive function at baseline and week 2. Also, we applied the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24) to assess patients’ depressive symptoms at baseline and week 2. Results After 10 sessions of treatment, the rTMS combined with the tDCS group showed more significant improvements in the RBANS total score, immediate memory, and visuospatial/constructional index score (all p < 0.05). Moreover, post hoc tests revealed a significant increase in the RBANS total score and Visuospatial/Constructional in the combined treatment group compared to the other three groups but in the immediate memory, the combined treatment group only showed a better improvement than the sham group. The results also showed the RBANS total score increased significantly higher in the active rTMS group compared with the sham group. However, rTMS or tDCS alone was not superior to the sham group in terms of other cognitive performance. In addition, the rTMS combined with the tDCS group showed a greater reduction in HDRS-24 total score and a better depression response rate than the other three groups. Conclusions rTMS combined with tDCS treatment is more effective than any single intervention in treating cognitive dysfunction and depressive symptoms in MDD patients. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052122).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI