摘要
No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Feb 2016Do Ultrasensitive Prostate Specific Antigen Measurements Have a Role in Predicting Long-Term Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival in Men after Radical Prostatectomy? Lori J. Sokoll, Zhen Zhang, Daniel W. Chan, Adam C. Reese, Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Alan W. Partin, and Patrick C. Walsh Lori J. SokollLori J. Sokoll Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author , Zhen ZhangZhen Zhang Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author , Daniel W. ChanDaniel W. Chan Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author , Adam C. ReeseAdam C. Reese James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author , Trinity J. BivalacquaTrinity J. Bivalacqua James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author , Alan W. PartinAlan W. Partin Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author , and Patrick C. WalshPatrick C. Walsh James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.080AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: In this study we evaluate an ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen assay in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy to predict long-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. Materials and Methods: A total of 754 men who underwent radical prostatectomy and had an undetectable prostate specific antigen after surgery (less than 0.1 ng/ml) were studied. Prostate specific antigen was measured in banked serum specimens with an ultrasensitive assay (Hybritech® PSA, Beckman Coulter Access® 2) using a cutoff of 0.01 ng/ml. Prostate specific antigen was also measured in 44 men after cystoprostatectomy who had no pathological evidence of prostate cancer with the Hybritech assay and with the Quanterix AccuPSA™ assay. Results: Of the 754 men 17% (131) experienced biochemical recurrence (median 4.0 years). Those men without biochemical recurrence (83%, 623) had a minimum of 5 years of followup (median 11). Prostate specific antigen was less than 0.01 ng/ml in 93.4% of men with no biochemical recurrence, whereas 30.5% of men with biochemical recurrence had a prostate specific antigen of 0.01 ng/ml or greater. On multivariate analysis postoperative prostate specific antigen at a 0.01 ng/ml cutoff, pathological stage and Gleason score, and surgical margins were significant independent predictors of biochemical recurrence risk. Kaplan-Meier estimates for mean biochemical recurrence-free survival were 15.2 years (95% CI 14.9–15.6) for prostate specific antigen less than 0.01 ng/ml and 10.0 years (95% CI 8.4–11.5) for prostate specific antigen 0.01 ng/ml or greater (p <0.0001). Biochemical recurrence-free rates 11 years after surgery were 86.1% (95% CI 83.2–89.0) for prostate specific antigen less than 0.01 ng/ml and 48.9% (95% CI 37.5–60.3) for prostate specific antigen 0.01 ng/ml or greater (p <0.0001). Prostate specific antigen concentrations in 44 men after cystoprostatectomy were all less than 0.03 ng/ml, with 95.4% less than 0.01 ng/ml. Conclusions: In men with a serum prostate specific antigen less than 0.1 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy a tenfold lower cutoff (0.01 ng/ml) stratified biochemical recurrence-free survival and was a significant independent predictor of biochemical recurrence, as were pathological features. Prostate specific antigen concentrations in men without pathological evidence of prostate cancer suggest that a higher prostate specific antigen concentration (0.03 ng/ml) in the ultrasensitive range may be needed to define the detection threshold. References 1 : Biomarkers for prostate cancer. Annu Rev Med2009; 60: 139. Google Scholar 2 : Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA1999; 281: 1591. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 3 : The natural history of metastatic progression in men with prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up. BJU Int2012; 109: 32. Google Scholar 4 : Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: AUA/ASTRO Guideline. J Urol2013; 190: 441. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Defining biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a proposal for a standardized definition. J Clin Oncol2006; 24: 3973. Google Scholar 6 Prostate Cancer (Version 1.2015), National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2014. Google Scholar 7 : Sensitive prostate specific antigen measurements identify men with long disease-free intervals and differentiate aggressive from indolent cancer recurrences within 2 years after radical prostatectomy. J Urol1997; 157: 1322. Link, Google Scholar 8 : Early detection of recurrent prostate cancer with an ultrasensitive chemiluminescent prostate-specific antigen assay. Urology1997; 50: 573. Google Scholar 9 : Detection of prostate cancer relapse with prostate specific antigen monitoring at levels of 0.001 to 0.1 micro g./l. J Urol1997; 157: 913. Link, Google Scholar 10 : Ultrasensitive detection of prostate specific antigen in the followup of 422 patients after radical prostatectomy. J Urol1999; 161: 1206. Link, Google Scholar 11 : PSA testing for the pretreatment staging and posttreatment management of prostate cancer: 2013 revision of 2009 best practice statement. Linthicum, Maryland: American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc2013. Google Scholar 12 : Nanoparticle-based bio-barcode assay redefines “undetectable” PSA and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2009; 106: 18437. Google Scholar 13 : NADiA ProsVue prostate-specific antigen slope is an independent prognostic marker for identifying men at reduced risk of clinical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Urology2012; 80: 1319. Google Scholar 14 : Nucleic acid detection immunoassay for prostate-specific antigen based on immuno-PCR methodology. Clin Chem2012; 58: 732. Google Scholar 15 : Fifth-generation digital immunoassay for prostate-specific antigen by single molecule array technology. Clin Chem2011; 57: 1712. Google Scholar 16 : Clinical evaluation of a novel method for the measurement of prostate-specific antigen, AccuPSA(TM), as a predictor of 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy: results of a pilot study. BJU Int2012; 109: 1770. Google Scholar 17 : Ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen and its role after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. J Urol2015; 193: 1525. Link, Google Scholar 18 : Prostate-specific antigen measured 3 months after radical prostatectomy as a new predictor of biochemical recurrence. Int J Clin Oncol2015; 20: 171. Google Scholar 19 : Prognostic significance of undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen nadir after radical prostatectomy. Urology2010; 76: 723. Google Scholar 20 : Ultrasensitive serum prostate specific antigen nadir accurately predicts the risk of early relapse after radical prostatectomy. J Urol2005; 173: 777. Link, Google Scholar 21 : Optimal definition of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy depends on pathologic risk factors: identifying candidates for early salvage therapy. Eur Urol2014; 66: 204. Google Scholar 22 : Low detectable prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy–treat or watch?. J Urol2014; 192: 1390. Link, Google Scholar 23 : Prognostic implications of an undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol2010; 57: 622. Google Scholar 24 : Editorial comment on: prognostic implications of an undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol2010; 57: 630. Google Scholar 25 : The relationship of ultrasensitive measurements of prostate-specific antigen levels to prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int2006; 98: 540. Google Scholar 26 : Nonprostatic sources of prostate-specific antigen. Urol Clin North Am1997; 24: 275. Google Scholar 27 : Expression of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) in ileum and other extraprostatic tissues. Int J Cancer2005; 113: 290. Google Scholar 28 : Is prostate-specific antigen surveillance necessary in men with benign prostate pathology following radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer?. Urol Int2010; 85: 466. Google Scholar 29 : Does benign prostatic tissue contribute to measurable PSA levels after radical prostatectomy?. Urology2009; 74: 167. Google Scholar 30 : Can we stop prostate specific antigen testing 10 years after radical prostatectomy?. J Urol2011; 186: 500. Link, Google Scholar © 2016 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGreenberg S, Washington S, Lonergan P, Cowan J, Baskin A, Nguyen H, Odisho A, Simko J and Carroll P (2021) Residual Benign Prostate Glandular Tissue after Radical Prostatectomy is Not Associated with the Development of Detectable Postoperative Serum Prostate Specific AntigenJournal of Urology, VOL. 206, NO. 3, (706-714), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021.Matsumoto K, Komatsuda A, Yanai Y, Niwa N, Kosaka T, Mizuno R, Kikuchi E, Miyajima A and Oya M (2016) Determining When to Stop Prostate Specific Antigen Monitoring after Radical Prostatectomy: the Role of Ultrasensitive Prostate Specific AntigenJournal of Urology, VOL. 197, NO. 3 Part 1, (655-661), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017.Ellis W (2015) Should Clinicians Use Ultrasensitive Prostate Specific Antigen Measurements for Patient Evaluation?Journal of Urology, VOL. 195, NO. 2, (243-244), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016. Volume 195Issue 2February 2016Page: 330-336Supplementary Materials Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordsprostatic neoplasmsrecurrenceprostatectomyprostate-specific antigenAcknowledgmentsDebra Elliott and Elizabeth Humphreys contributed to this study.Metrics Author Information Lori J. Sokoll Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author Zhen Zhang Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author Daniel W. Chan Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author Adam C. Reese James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author Trinity J. Bivalacqua James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author Alan W. Partin Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author Patrick C. Walsh James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...