Do Ultrasensitive Prostate Specific Antigen Measurements Have a Role in Predicting Long-Term Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival in Men after Radical Prostatectomy?

医学 前列腺切除术 前列腺特异性抗原 生化复发 泌尿科 前列腺癌 前列腺 抗原 列线图 病态的 内科学 胃肠病学 癌症 免疫学
作者
Lori J. Sokoll,Zhen Zhang,Daniel W. Chan,Adam C. Reese,Trinity J. Bivalacqua,Alan W. Partin,Patrick C. Walsh
出处
期刊:The Journal of Urology [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:195 (2): 330-336 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.080
摘要

No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Feb 2016Do Ultrasensitive Prostate Specific Antigen Measurements Have a Role in Predicting Long-Term Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival in Men after Radical Prostatectomy? Lori J. Sokoll, Zhen Zhang, Daniel W. Chan, Adam C. Reese, Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Alan W. Partin, and Patrick C. Walsh Lori J. SokollLori J. Sokoll Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author , Zhen ZhangZhen Zhang Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author , Daniel W. ChanDaniel W. Chan Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author , Adam C. ReeseAdam C. Reese James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author , Trinity J. BivalacquaTrinity J. Bivalacqua James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author , Alan W. PartinAlan W. Partin Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author , and Patrick C. WalshPatrick C. Walsh James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.080AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: In this study we evaluate an ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen assay in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy to predict long-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. Materials and Methods: A total of 754 men who underwent radical prostatectomy and had an undetectable prostate specific antigen after surgery (less than 0.1 ng/ml) were studied. Prostate specific antigen was measured in banked serum specimens with an ultrasensitive assay (Hybritech® PSA, Beckman Coulter Access® 2) using a cutoff of 0.01 ng/ml. Prostate specific antigen was also measured in 44 men after cystoprostatectomy who had no pathological evidence of prostate cancer with the Hybritech assay and with the Quanterix AccuPSA™ assay. Results: Of the 754 men 17% (131) experienced biochemical recurrence (median 4.0 years). Those men without biochemical recurrence (83%, 623) had a minimum of 5 years of followup (median 11). Prostate specific antigen was less than 0.01 ng/ml in 93.4% of men with no biochemical recurrence, whereas 30.5% of men with biochemical recurrence had a prostate specific antigen of 0.01 ng/ml or greater. On multivariate analysis postoperative prostate specific antigen at a 0.01 ng/ml cutoff, pathological stage and Gleason score, and surgical margins were significant independent predictors of biochemical recurrence risk. Kaplan-Meier estimates for mean biochemical recurrence-free survival were 15.2 years (95% CI 14.9–15.6) for prostate specific antigen less than 0.01 ng/ml and 10.0 years (95% CI 8.4–11.5) for prostate specific antigen 0.01 ng/ml or greater (p <0.0001). Biochemical recurrence-free rates 11 years after surgery were 86.1% (95% CI 83.2–89.0) for prostate specific antigen less than 0.01 ng/ml and 48.9% (95% CI 37.5–60.3) for prostate specific antigen 0.01 ng/ml or greater (p <0.0001). Prostate specific antigen concentrations in 44 men after cystoprostatectomy were all less than 0.03 ng/ml, with 95.4% less than 0.01 ng/ml. Conclusions: In men with a serum prostate specific antigen less than 0.1 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy a tenfold lower cutoff (0.01 ng/ml) stratified biochemical recurrence-free survival and was a significant independent predictor of biochemical recurrence, as were pathological features. Prostate specific antigen concentrations in men without pathological evidence of prostate cancer suggest that a higher prostate specific antigen concentration (0.03 ng/ml) in the ultrasensitive range may be needed to define the detection threshold. References 1 : Biomarkers for prostate cancer. Annu Rev Med2009; 60: 139. Google Scholar 2 : Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA1999; 281: 1591. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 3 : The natural history of metastatic progression in men with prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up. BJU Int2012; 109: 32. Google Scholar 4 : Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: AUA/ASTRO Guideline. J Urol2013; 190: 441. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Defining biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a proposal for a standardized definition. J Clin Oncol2006; 24: 3973. Google Scholar 6 Prostate Cancer (Version 1.2015), National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2014. Google Scholar 7 : Sensitive prostate specific antigen measurements identify men with long disease-free intervals and differentiate aggressive from indolent cancer recurrences within 2 years after radical prostatectomy. J Urol1997; 157: 1322. Link, Google Scholar 8 : Early detection of recurrent prostate cancer with an ultrasensitive chemiluminescent prostate-specific antigen assay. Urology1997; 50: 573. Google Scholar 9 : Detection of prostate cancer relapse with prostate specific antigen monitoring at levels of 0.001 to 0.1 micro g./l. J Urol1997; 157: 913. Link, Google Scholar 10 : Ultrasensitive detection of prostate specific antigen in the followup of 422 patients after radical prostatectomy. J Urol1999; 161: 1206. Link, Google Scholar 11 : PSA testing for the pretreatment staging and posttreatment management of prostate cancer: 2013 revision of 2009 best practice statement. Linthicum, Maryland: American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc2013. Google Scholar 12 : Nanoparticle-based bio-barcode assay redefines “undetectable” PSA and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2009; 106: 18437. Google Scholar 13 : NADiA ProsVue prostate-specific antigen slope is an independent prognostic marker for identifying men at reduced risk of clinical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Urology2012; 80: 1319. Google Scholar 14 : Nucleic acid detection immunoassay for prostate-specific antigen based on immuno-PCR methodology. Clin Chem2012; 58: 732. Google Scholar 15 : Fifth-generation digital immunoassay for prostate-specific antigen by single molecule array technology. Clin Chem2011; 57: 1712. Google Scholar 16 : Clinical evaluation of a novel method for the measurement of prostate-specific antigen, AccuPSA(TM), as a predictor of 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy: results of a pilot study. BJU Int2012; 109: 1770. Google Scholar 17 : Ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen and its role after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. J Urol2015; 193: 1525. Link, Google Scholar 18 : Prostate-specific antigen measured 3 months after radical prostatectomy as a new predictor of biochemical recurrence. Int J Clin Oncol2015; 20: 171. Google Scholar 19 : Prognostic significance of undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen nadir after radical prostatectomy. Urology2010; 76: 723. Google Scholar 20 : Ultrasensitive serum prostate specific antigen nadir accurately predicts the risk of early relapse after radical prostatectomy. J Urol2005; 173: 777. Link, Google Scholar 21 : Optimal definition of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy depends on pathologic risk factors: identifying candidates for early salvage therapy. Eur Urol2014; 66: 204. Google Scholar 22 : Low detectable prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy–treat or watch?. J Urol2014; 192: 1390. Link, Google Scholar 23 : Prognostic implications of an undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol2010; 57: 622. Google Scholar 24 : Editorial comment on: prognostic implications of an undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol2010; 57: 630. Google Scholar 25 : The relationship of ultrasensitive measurements of prostate-specific antigen levels to prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int2006; 98: 540. Google Scholar 26 : Nonprostatic sources of prostate-specific antigen. Urol Clin North Am1997; 24: 275. Google Scholar 27 : Expression of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) in ileum and other extraprostatic tissues. Int J Cancer2005; 113: 290. Google Scholar 28 : Is prostate-specific antigen surveillance necessary in men with benign prostate pathology following radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer?. Urol Int2010; 85: 466. Google Scholar 29 : Does benign prostatic tissue contribute to measurable PSA levels after radical prostatectomy?. Urology2009; 74: 167. Google Scholar 30 : Can we stop prostate specific antigen testing 10 years after radical prostatectomy?. J Urol2011; 186: 500. Link, Google Scholar © 2016 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGreenberg S, Washington S, Lonergan P, Cowan J, Baskin A, Nguyen H, Odisho A, Simko J and Carroll P (2021) Residual Benign Prostate Glandular Tissue after Radical Prostatectomy is Not Associated with the Development of Detectable Postoperative Serum Prostate Specific AntigenJournal of Urology, VOL. 206, NO. 3, (706-714), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021.Matsumoto K, Komatsuda A, Yanai Y, Niwa N, Kosaka T, Mizuno R, Kikuchi E, Miyajima A and Oya M (2016) Determining When to Stop Prostate Specific Antigen Monitoring after Radical Prostatectomy: the Role of Ultrasensitive Prostate Specific AntigenJournal of Urology, VOL. 197, NO. 3 Part 1, (655-661), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017.Ellis W (2015) Should Clinicians Use Ultrasensitive Prostate Specific Antigen Measurements for Patient Evaluation?Journal of Urology, VOL. 195, NO. 2, (243-244), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016. Volume 195Issue 2February 2016Page: 330-336Supplementary Materials Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordsprostatic neoplasmsrecurrenceprostatectomyprostate-specific antigenAcknowledgmentsDebra Elliott and Elizabeth Humphreys contributed to this study.Metrics Author Information Lori J. Sokoll Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author Zhen Zhang Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author Daniel W. Chan Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author Adam C. Reese James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author Trinity J. Bivalacqua James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author Alan W. Partin Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author Patrick C. Walsh James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
传奇3应助maomao采纳,获得10
1秒前
稀罕你发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助毛豆爸爸采纳,获得10
2秒前
naonao完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
摆烂的实验室打工人完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Jenny发布了新的文献求助50
4秒前
5秒前
hehe完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
naonao发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Glufo完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
qqqqqq发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
忘羡222发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
紫菜发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
14秒前
14秒前
独特亦旋完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
今后应助qqqqqq采纳,获得10
16秒前
小马甲应助飞羽采纳,获得10
16秒前
星辰大海应助西内!卡Q因采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
彬彬发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
太叔捕完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
高磊发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
RH完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
zhangzhen完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
科研通AI2S应助zfzf0422采纳,获得10
22秒前
Wendy1204发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
23秒前
lydy1993完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
滴滴哒哒完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
SciGPT应助波波玛奇朵采纳,获得10
27秒前
戏言121完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
迷人的映雁完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
美丽的之双完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
阿会完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
wqm完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
Luis Lacasa - Sobre esto y aquello 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527990
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3108173
关于积分的说明 9287913
捐赠科研通 2805882
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1540119
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716941
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709824