作者
Shun Lü,Xiaorong Dong,Hong Jian,Jianhua Chen,Gongyan Chen,Yuping Sun,Yinghua Ji,Ziping Wang,Jianhua Shi,Junguo Lu,Shaoshui Chen,Dongqing Lv,Guojun Zhang,Chunling Liu,Juan Li,Xinmin Yu,Zhong Lin,Zhuang Yu,Zhehai Wang,Jiuwei Cui,Xingxiang Xu,Jian Fang,Jifeng Feng,Zhixiang Xu,Rui Ma,Jie Hu,Nong Yang,Xiangdong Zhou,Xiaohong Wu,Chengping Hu,Zhihong Zhang,You Lü,Yanping Hu,Liyan Jiang,Qiming Wang,Renhua Guo,Jianying Zhou,Baolan Li,Chunhong Hu,Wan-cheng Tong,Helong Zhang,Lin Ma,Yuan Chen,Zhijun Jie,Yu Yao,Longzhen Zhang,Jie Weng,Weidong Li,Jianping Xiong,Xianwei Ye,Jianchun Duan,Haihua Yang,Meili Sun,Changan Sun,Hongying Wei,Chuan Li,Siraj M. Ali,Vincent A. Miller,Qiong Wu
摘要
Aumolertinib (formerly almonertinib; HS-10296) is a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in China. This double-blind phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of aumolertinib compared with gefitinib as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03849768).Patients at 53 sites in China were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either aumolertinib (110 mg) or gefitinib (250 mg) once daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment.A total of 429 patients who were naïve to treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were enrolled. PFS was significantly longer with aumolertinib compared with gefitinib (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.60; P < .0001). The median PFS with aumolertinib was 19.3 months (95% CI, 17.8 to 20.8) versus 9.9 months with gefitinib (95% CI, 8.3 to 12.6). Objective response rate and disease control rate were similar in the aumolertinib and gefitinib groups (objective response rate, 73.8% and 72.1%, respectively; disease control rate, 93.0% and 96.7%, respectively). The median duration of response was 18.1 months (95% CI, 15.2 to not applicable) with aumolertinib versus 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 11.1) with gefitinib. Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 severity (any cause) were observed in 36.4% and 35.8% of patients in the aumolertinib and gefitinib groups, respectively. Rash and diarrhea (any grade) were observed in 23.4% and 16.4% of patients who received aumolertinib compared with 41.4% and 35.8% of those who received gefitinib, respectively.Aumolertinib is a well-tolerated third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that could serve as a treatment option for EGFR-mutant NSCLC in the first-line setting.