问责
感觉
工艺
动作(物理)
实证研究
心理学
认知
过程(计算)
社会会计
公共关系
社会心理学
政治学
业务
会计
认识论
管理会计
法学
计算机科学
神经科学
物理
操作系统
哲学
考古
历史
量子力学
作者
Jennifer S. Lerner,Philip E. Tetlock
标识
DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255
摘要
This article reviews the now extensive research literature addressing the impact of accountability on a wide range of social judgments and choices. It focuses on 4 issues: (a) What impact do various accountability ground rules have on thoughts, feelings, and action? (b) Under what conditions will accountability attenuate, have no effect on, or amplify cognitive biases? (c) Does accountability alter how people think or merely what people say they think? and (d) What goals do accountable decision makers seek to achieve? In addition, this review explores the broader implications of accountability research. It highlights the utility of treating thought as a process of internalized dialogue; the importance of documenting social and institutional boundary conditions on putative cognitive biases; and the potential to craft empirical answers to such applied problems as how to structure accountability relationships in organizations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI