中心组合设计
稳健性(进化)
复合数
响应面法
计算机科学
题字图形
可靠性工程
工程类
数学
算法
机器学习
几何学
生物化学
基因
化学
作者
Zhihong Zhang,Xiaofeng Bai
标识
DOI:10.1109/icacc.2009.48
摘要
A comparative study of the three important Central Composite Designs(CCDs) in Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was presented. The three CCDs are Central Composite Circumscribed design (CCC), Central Composite Inscribed design(CCI) and Central Composite Face-centred design (CCF). Characteristics of the three designs were analyzed and guide lines were provided with some key concepts about CCDs. Then evaluation and comparison were made among CCC, CCI and CCF from the view of region of interest and robustness of design through simulation of a motor assembly. The results show that effective experiment of design cannot be gained without correct selection of CCC, CCI and CCF. Lastly, the guidelines for selecting CCDs were given. This study will provide better foundation for practice applications.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI