Chemotherapy for Elderly Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) Phase III Randomized Trial

医学 肺癌 随机对照试验 化疗 癌症 肿瘤科 内科学
作者
C. Gridelli,Federica Perrone,Ciro Gallo,S. Cigolari,Antônio Rossi,Franco Vito Piantedosi,Santi Barbera,Francesco Ferraù,E. Piazza,Francesco Rosetti,M. Clerici,Oscar Bertetto,Sergio Robbiati,L. Frontini,Chiara Sacco,Fabiana Castiglione,Adolfo Favaretto,Silvia Novello,M.R. Migliorino,Giampietro Gasparini
出处
期刊:Journal of the National Cancer Institute [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:95 (5): 362-372 被引量:802
标识
DOI:10.1093/jnci/95.5.362
摘要

Vinorelbine prolongs survival and improves quality of life in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Some studies have also suggested that gemcitabine is well tolerated and effective in such patients. We compared the effectiveness and toxicity of the combination of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine with those of each drug given alone in an open-label, randomized phase III trial in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.Patients aged 70 years and older, enrolled between December 1997 and November 2000, were randomly assigned to receive intravenous vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2) of body surface area), gemcitabine (1200 mg/m(2)), or vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2)) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)). All treatments were delivered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary endpoint was survival. Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by the Mantel-Haenszel test. Secondary endpoints were quality of life and toxicity.Of 698 patients available for intention-to-treat analysis, 233 were assigned to receive vinorelbine, 233 to gemcitabine, and 232 to vinorelbine plus gemcitabine. Compared with each single drug, the combination treatment did not improve survival. The hazard ratio of death for patients receiving the combination treatment was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 1.44) that of patients receiving vinorelbine and 1.06 (95% CI = 0.86 to 1.29) that of patients receiving gemcitabine. Although quality of life was similar across the three treatment arms, the combination treatment was more toxic than the two drugs given singly.The combination of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine is not more effective than single-agent vinorelbine or gemcitabine in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
sy发布了新的文献求助20
刚刚
pond完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
慕青应助山河入梦来采纳,获得10
1秒前
方源发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
快乐的嚣完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
dkjg完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
花椒鱼完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
隐形曼青应助腼腆的白莲采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
xzy998应助光亮寄凡采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
刘慧鑫发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
yyauthor发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
指哪打哪完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
八百标兵完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
***发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
星辰大海应助winwin采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
WorkahoLic发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
老李发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
camellia发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
可爱的函函应助咖飞采纳,获得10
9秒前
852应助谨慎的自中采纳,获得10
10秒前
薛乎虚发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
xyh发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
hcmsaobang2001完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
科研通AI6.1应助Taxwitted采纳,获得10
13秒前
科研通AI6.1应助南风采纳,获得10
13秒前
crystal发布了新的文献求助20
13秒前
小薛发布了新的文献求助50
13秒前
Rosie发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
困困狗发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 2000
Standard: In-Space Storable Fluid Transfer for Prepared Spacecraft (AIAA S-157-2024) 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5948897
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7118979
关于积分的说明 15913906
捐赠科研通 5081948
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2732269
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1692743
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1615507