Responding to Student Writing

教育学 数学教育 高等教育 心理学 社会学 语言学 哲学 政治学 法学
作者
Nancy Sommers
出处
期刊:College Composition and Communication [JSTOR]
卷期号:33 (2): 148-148 被引量:388
标识
DOI:10.2307/357622
摘要

Most teachers estimate that it takes them at least 20 to 40 minutes to comment on an individual student paper, and those 20 to 40 minutes times 20 students per class, times 8 papers, more or less, during the course of a semester add up to an enormous amount of time. With so much time and energy directed to a single activity, it is important for us to understand the nature of the enterprise. For it seems, paradoxically enough, that although commenting on student writing is the most widely used method for responding to student writing, it is the least understood. We do not know in any definitive way what constitutes thoughtful commentary or what effect, if any, our comments have on helping our students become more effective writers. Theoretically, at least, we know that we comment on our students' writing for the same reasons professional editors comment on the work of professional writers or for the same reasons we ask our colleagues to read and respond to our own writing. As writers we need and want thoughtful commentary to show us when we have communicated our ideas and when not, raising questions from a reader's point of view that may not have occurred to us as writers. We want to know if our writing has communicated our intended meaning and, if not, what questions or discrepancies our reader sees that we, as writers, are blind to. In commenting on our students' writing, however, we have an additional pedagogical purpose. As teachers,'we know that most students find it difficult to imagine a reader's response in advance, and to use such responses as a guide in composing. Thus, we comment on student writing to dramatize the presence of a reader, to help our students to become that questioning reader themselves, because, ultimately, we believe that becoming such a reader will help them to evaluate what they have written and develop control over their writing. 1
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
无奈书包发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
我唉科研完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
cccc完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
哈哈哈啊完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
pugss完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
zhang完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Liu完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
bkagyin应助淡定的晓刚采纳,获得10
5秒前
韩乐乐发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
澈哩完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
小彤完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
一进实验室就犯困完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
Zhjie126完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
多情怜蕾发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
LX完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
τ涛发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
feedid完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
小M完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
韩乐乐完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
yuan发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
龙龙完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
yinggill完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
努力向上的小刘完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
二个虎牙完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
研友_8y2G0L发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
牛安荷完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
寄云间完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
璟晔完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
笨笨烨华完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
踏实的嵩发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
高分求助中
Lire en communiste 1000
Ore genesis in the Zambian Copperbelt with particular reference to the northern sector of the Chambishi basin 800
Becoming: An Introduction to Jung's Concept of Individuation 600
Communist propaganda: a fact book, 1957-1958 500
Briefe aus Shanghai 1946‒1952 (Dokumente eines Kulturschocks) 500
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
A new species of Velataspis (Hemiptera Coccoidea Diaspididae) from tea in Assam 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3167325
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2818822
关于积分的说明 7922729
捐赠科研通 2478613
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1320412
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 632776
版权声明 602443